h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
These are grass seeds, coated in plastic. Mix them in concrete, pour a pad, construct a building over it, and nothing happens. Not until years later, when Wal-Mart has gone to the other side of town, leaving only that unsightly and indestructible pad. A year or two of exposure to rain, and the polymer
softens; the seeds begin to absorb water. They begin to grow, developing hydrostatic pressure, pushing against the concrete. A web of almost invisible cracks form in the surface, and more water seeps in. Its an accelerating process. Within months, the once monolithic structure is reduced to gravel, covered with tall fescue.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
|
A fine idea. However, why not do this with crop seeds? In the event that society collapses, periodically some maize or okra will spring forth from the decaying rubble. Our degenerate descendants, clad in foraged 2-liter pop bottles and their own blue mutant fur, will find these precious gifts, cultivate them, and begin civilization anew. |
|
|
Such an interesting idea: impregnate the cement in concrete with the seminal (eco-systemal/prodigal) energy to quickly reclaim the failed land-grabbing ventures (business or otherwise) of those arrogant Homo Sapien bastards! Cool... (I hate them!) |
|
|
But ... what is your polymer/plastic coating that just "softens" (bio-degradable plastics are mostly phony: they just add cellulose); and WHY are these seeds not just destroyed by the natural compression from the self-compacting concrete as it settles (read: dehydrates); and, even worse, the exothermic heat involved? (Calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide.) |
|
|
Contigent: [-] until I know... |
|
|
//Contigent// sp. "cogent" |
|
|
[marked-for-self-deletion] OK, you got me! But I got you too: the word should be "contiNgent", not cogent. |
|
|
I guess the spelling-cop [rocephalous] is human after all! Sad day... (And [normzone] wanted to install you as a spell-check button...) |
|
|
<smacks forehead> "contiNgent"! How /could/ I be so stupid? </sf> |
|
|
Are you taking the you-know-what, [IT]? |
|
| |