h a l f b a k e r yWhat was the question again?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
One way to secure an election that I haven't seen explored is secure paper ballots. These ballots would be made almost impossible to duplicate, and dependent on a certain kind of paper. They would be printed at the polling booth. They would be serialized with a hash based on the voter's name. So it would
be trivial to detect whether a particular voter actually used a particular ballot and mathematically very difficult (let alone practically given the need to use the same printing machines to print up extra ballots) to make the paper necessary for ballot stuffing.
The voter or if a machine is filling it out the printer could be equipped with the necessary ink.
Security features include: Microprint of the voter's name. Hashed serial number. Grease paper that doesn't accommodate common inks. Holograms. Embedded fiber.
[link]
|
|
While those are valid criticisms "I don't think election fraud happens" is not one. |
|
|
As tempted as I am to debate recent allegations of election fraud in a particular country, it's not directly related to the idea. |
|
|
//voter tracking scheme// |
|
|
Agree that it's a non issue. And I also agree personally
identifiable ballots are a really bad idea. |
|
|
Switching to a particular paper, or watermarks, or
embossing all are possible safety measures. (Of course,
counterfeiters still get around those). But they'll increase
the cost of elections, which are already expensive. |
|
|
It's a good thing we take election safety as carefully as we do aircraft safety. If an aircraft goes down it could kill hundreds. But when elections are manipulated it can kill millions. Fortunately we dismiss anyone reporting an alleged plane crash as a kook and let the airlines manage the FAA, so that elections are at least as carefully looked after. |
|
|
You do realize that every single claim of electoral fraud is
investigated right? Admittedly, it helps if you report them
to the police, not a shady lawyer, but they are investigated.
And 2 actual cases were found in this last election. (Both
voted for Trump). |
|
|
Just two out of hundreds of millions of voters! That's a really, really low number. I'm happy our government is watching out for this sort of thing and definitely doing a proper investigation. In other countries when any election number approaches unity to that level it's strong evidence of corruption, but we're blessed to be in a country that would never allow a cabal of the wealthy to manipulate results and lie about those numbers. |
|
|
The fancy paper isn't intended to prevent fraud, it's to facilitate all those careful investigations we do. All two of them. |
|
|
Oh, and both cases of fraud were people attempting to use
a dead relative's ballot. They had all the necessary
documentation. They were not injecting fake ballots into
the system. The system actually has really careful
safeguards against that. |
|
| |