h a l f b a k e r yThunk.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Designers have a certain idea of what they want when they create an article of clothing, whether it be a high-fashion dress or pre-faded jeans.
This idea is to include specific olfactory "designs" with the product to enhance that vision. Since I don't have a magical process to imbue clothing with
scent, a plain old spray-bottle will do, for the nonce.
Corduroy jacket with leather patches - "Eau du tabac et brandie".
Superbowl Sweatshirt - Fresh hops
Little Black Number - Chanel#5 (okay that's pretty well baked, but just for convenience...)
Blue Jeans/Jacket - Leather
Plaid Quilted Shirt - Pineforest
Anthing Polyester - Ass
Variable version
http://www.smartsec...secondskindress.htm "interactive fabric emitting a selection of scents depending on your mood" [angel, Apr 30 2008]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
|
This is an idea for selling clothing together with perfume. |
|
|
I have yet to like a scent made by a designer (or, more accurately, labelled by a designed), so I don't have high hopes for this in practice. |
|
|
[daseva] not really, the scent is for the clothing, not the person. |
|
|
[+] Isn't this somewhat baked already? I mean I understand what the author is expressing, however, it seems very similar to what fashion and clothing designers do already. |
|
|
I mention nothing of who (or what) receives the scent. My point is that this is an idea for a combination product and not for imbuing clothing with scent as the title implies. [-] for careless title. |
|
|
[daseva] second paragraph edited; read it. |
|
|
The original idea was part of the "Emergency Dryer", ie: add a bit of scent to the hot air drying the clothing... but the ideas stand better separately, IMHO. |
|
| |