Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Go ahead. Stick a fork in it.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


             

Save the Hubble, Privately

  (+2)
(+2)
  [vote for,
against]

So, there's currently a big uproar over the demise of Hubble. The inclusion in this year's budget of $70 million dollars to safely kill it (make sure it falls on ocean rather than a populated area) pretty much seals its doom, as far as the government is concerned.

The private space industry has been growing over the past several decades. Private companies now routinely put satellites into orbit. The X-Prize stimulated private funding of a manned space flight.

So, my idea is for a private individual or organization to plan a service mission to Hubble. There are at least two years to plan it - earliest estimates of Hubble dying are 2007. There could be several more years of life in Hubble, though, depending on exactly when its parts fail and if scientists can figure out how to make it work with only two functioning gyroscopes.

Your thoughts?

lyrl, Feb 27 2005


Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.



Annotation:







       Hmm, offer $70million as an X-prize to rescue it?
david_scothern, Feb 27 2005
  

       Surely the shuttle could put it back in it's original orbit almost as easily as it put it there the first time?
wagster, Feb 27 2005
  

       It could, yes, but since the Columbia accident, new shuttle flight rules prohibit any flight path that cannot reach International Space Station orbit, and Hubble is not on an ISS flight path. Therefore the shuttle can't go to Hubble anymore. Since any Hubble rescue/repair mission will require a manned flight, and the shuttle is the only transport we got...   

       It's all very stupid.
waugsqueke, Feb 27 2005
  

       Yeah, that's really dumb. Not content with our access to space being restricted to the tiny little area we can actually get to, NASA have restricted it further to include almost nothing at all. Let's get Spaceship One up there.
wagster, Feb 27 2005
  

       Spaceship one is sub-orbital.
I'v read that the sonyoz(sp?) could potentialy be used.
I'v read that replacing the hubble would be cheaper than repairing it.
my-nep, Feb 28 2005
  

       Hire it out as a private high-powered spy satellite. Useful for anything from private investigator work to stealing corporate secrets through competitor's skylights.
Worldgineer, Feb 28 2005
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle