h a l f b a k e r yTrying to contain nuts.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
A good number of location based services only really need to know roughly whereabouts you are located in order to provide a useful service. My suggestion is for a couple of new bits of information to be added to 'connected' devices in order to allow a device's location to be ascertained within a good
enough degree of accuracy. It goes like this:
My wifi router is static (i.e. it sits on our living room floor), and I know it's geographical grid reference, it can therefore be an authoritative source for location data (and given that it's connected to the internet, it also knows the time too).
Now imagine that I walk past my WiFi router with my WiFi enabled PDA. My PDA now asks the router for it's location and the current time. The router is authoritative for both, so hands over the information.
Now I go out for a walk with my PDA, and 500m down the road (Charing Cross Road as it turns out), another Wifi PDA comes in to range of mine, they talk to each other and find out that
a) my PDA has 2nd hand knowledge of its location 2 minutes ago
b) the other PDA has only 4th hand knowledge of its location, from 2 hours ago (it's been switched off).
So.. the protocol works out that 2nd hand information 2 minutes ago is better than 4th hand two hours ago, and the other PDA walks off armed with a better idea of its location.
Now.. I know this only gives a rough idea of where a device is (but that's all I want), it offers a few advantages over existing more precise technologies
gps: no need for additional hardware therefore cheaper
gprs triangulation: no network charges from the mobile operator (also more private) and works for non phone devices.
DNS LOC
http://www.ckdhr.com/dns-loc/ Here is the protocol you can use for this [krelnik, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]
Zeroconf & Multicast DNS
http://www.oreillyn...12/20/zeroconf.html (this might help too) [krelnik, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]
WiFi triangulation version
http://www.newscien...s.jsp?id=ns99996058 Jul 1 2004: Someone has baked a version that simply uses a database of WiFi access points, and triangulation of signals, to estimate your location. [krelnik, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]
Hitachi AirLocation
http://www.engadget...y/5215545011154201/ Jul 22 2004: Baked by Hitachi. It has the interesting characteristic that it can be powered by vibration (like some wristwatches) and turns on automatically when the device is moved. [krelnik, Oct 04 2004, last modified Oct 05 2004]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
The basic part of this (asking the infrastructure for it's location) is baked as an extension to DNS called "DNS LOC". See link. I like your peer-to-peer extension where the devices help each other determine location. |
|
|
yeah DNS-LOC would be a good starting point, but hopefully peer-to-peer (and non static ip devices/bluetooth etc.) would make make it more fun. |
|
|
I'd prefer the "Roughly, where am I going?" device. |
|
|
I thought you meant like:
|
|
|
"Tell me where I am or I'll smash your face in you git" |
|
|
or <assumes gruff accent> Where am I?</assumes gruff accent> |
|
|
That would be "gruffly where am I?" - a different idea completely! |
|
|
<Fast Show voice>Y'int sin me! Roight!</Fast Show voice> |
|
|
<fast show>Its Roobbish! Its Aaaallll Roobbish! Everything round 'ere is compete Roobbish!</fast show> Nice idea by the way! |
|
|
Read it in NewScientist the other day. Has an accuracy of about 40 meters. |
|
|
scuba, if you really mean to mark an
idea for deletion, you have to spell it
out in full or it won't be found when
housekeeping (look at the help file for
the full spelling).
That an idea is baked, is not
grounds for deletion, though. Remove
an idea that isn't well known and
someone else will just post it
again.
Plus, if you anly read about it in New
Scientist the other day, you might find
that this post predates the article you
read by some months. |
|
|
In fact, I linked to the NewScientist article three weeks ago. This idea definitely predates it. |
|
|
Thanks for the style points guys! Previous anno has been edited. |
|
| |