h a l f b a k e r y(Serving suggestion.)
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Roflwaffles are a WIBNI Megacorp(tm) food item hot off the press.
These Waffles are two centimetres across and printed in the letters/pictograms of any mainstream language and distributed in packets with various quantities inside. The main difference of these waffles to other similar products is that
they are pre-packaged ready to eat to cater more for todays fast food society.
Taste wise they are the same as normal (sweetened) waffles and the marketing campaign is targeted at children and internet users.
Give a dog a bun
http://en.wikipedia.../wiki/Rowlf_the_Dog [Jinbish, Mar 18 2010]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
I coudn't think of any other idea to go with the name of short of adding hallucinogens to them. |
|
|
huh, interesting [+] name sucks [-]... [ ] |
|
|
is this to play roflwaffle scrabble? |
|
|
The opposite of what [FlyingToaster] said. |
|
|
I want them airdropped from a roflcopter, or served by a waitress wearing lollerskates. |
|
|
Why would anyone want a waffle that had been on the floor? |
|
|
//the opposite// toss a bunch of pre-cooked bite-sized waffles in a bowl, nuke, add butter/syrup/bacon .... what's not to like ? |
|
|
//what's not to like// Soggy, that's what. The whole point of
waffles is the carefully engineered surface to volume ratio,
giving just the right balance of crispy outside to delicately
soft
interior. If you microwave them, you might as well be eating
Wonder Bread. Philistine. I bet you don't even use real
maple syrup. |
|
|
//you might as well be eating Wonder Bread// now *them's* fightin' words... possible point about the soggy, the wafflettes would have to start off a bit more cripsy than usual. |
|
|
//anyone want a waffle that had been on the floor?// |
|
|
"Why would" Omitted.
That's better. |
|
| |