h a l f b a k e r yAmbivalent? Are you sure?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
I love it when I get driven to work, but I can't leave when I want to, I depend on someone else.
So, like trailers behind a semi, why not connect several cars to a powerful drive vehicle that can tow several cars behind it. Like a 'road train'.
No flatbed or lifting of the cars. When you get
to your destination, disconnect from the connecting vehicle and drive away.
You could have a connector that is universal and mounted to partipating cars. Drive up to the train, connect and relax.
Cars would need a connector in the back and the front.
[link]
|
| |
So if I am third in a train of six cars and I detach at my destination, what happens the the three cars behind me? |
|
| |
How many times have we done this idea now? |
|
| |
[+] just for the Dr.'s fuddy-duddiness |
|
| |
So if I'm the first in a train of six cars and we accelerate or travel up hill my car gets stretched? Similarly upon deceleration or down hill my car gets squashed? |
|
| |
This would be for long trips, commutes to work where everybody is going the same place. |
|
| |
Or instead of buses in city traffic. Take a bunch of kia's and link them together permanently. I really buses. |
|
| |
Going up and down hills, yes you would be squashed and stretched. |
|
| |
I never even bothered to offer this idea, even though it's on my list of personal WIBNIs. |
|
| |
Heck, it has been proposed in PopSci since at least the 1950s |
|
| |