h a l f b a k e r yNumber one on the no-fly list
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure I've seen some of these ideas on the
halfbakery but I can't find them by subject. |
|
|
Nah, don't like it. What you describe, I think, is infinitely better accomplished via good writing skills. |
|
|
Example: "Oh, What a marvellous idea."
Sarcasm, or truth? How would it be marked up, either way? |
|
|
The text of "Oh, What a marvellous idea." could be
extended or contracted, raised or lowered, increased or
decreased in font, and colored according to variables from
a voiceprint of
someone saying, "Oh, What a marvellous idea." |
|
|
"OHH, what a M A R V O L O U S idea!" |
|
|
...HHH........... .............ARRRR...... ........De...
O... ...HHHH...what.a.MAA.... .....VOLOUS...i....a!
|
|
|
--except more subtley, and without the periods. |
|
|
The phonetic spelling is a real anchor weight to reading as we people tend to read by word shape, or even phrase shape, recognition (much as those who read music well see the overall shape and pattern of music rather than the individual notes). |
|
|
Making the language as expressive as musical notation is, in my opinion, a giant reduction in expressiveness. The musical compass is very small compared to that of language, at least English. |
|
|
How about representing the intonation,
pitch, rhythm and volume of speech as
... (I know this sounds crazy) ....an
audio file? |
|
|
Only that it's not accessible all at once like text. You can scan a testimony visually better than auditorily. This would be a way of getting lie-detector-like information all in one place at one time. |
|
|
Actually, THIS idea might solve the problem of getting a computer to read a book in an expressive way! Humans can figure out loudness and tone of voice and pacing from context and punctuation, but a computer needs other, more specific cues. You could have it read blue text in a sad tone of voice, red text in an angry tone, I guess purple could be lustful... a whole new meaning to purple prose! |
|
|
I like the idea, as a way to standardise vowel sounds and pitch changes. It might allow people to communicate across languages due to the standardisation - however, in many ways - i.e. within speech recognition systems, this is kind of baked in that the recorded sounds are tokenised and stored as discrete syllable patterns which are then compared to a database of known pattern/word sets. It's just that this internal notation has been designed for computers rather than for people. |
|
|
If memory serves me correctly, there used to be a standard phonetic notation used in the early days of speech synthesisers. I can remember typing strange looking syllables into the machine in order to try and get it so sound like it was from 'up north' etc. |
|
|
So, as much as I like the idea (providing a way to visually read voice transcripts in a way that keeps as much of the voice patterns intact during the conversion) It's use is reasonably limited, and is just a refinement of something that's been around for 15 years(the first time I remember playing with a speech synthesiser was late 80's) |
|
| |