h a l f b a k e r yGetting blown into traffic is never fun.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
I have huge sympathies for the Japanese. However, it
seems to me that they're handling the reactor situation
badly. The problem is "just" to get reasonable (not vast)
tonnages of water into reactors and particularly into a
storage pond, but it's as if they're not used to improvising
and jury-rigging. |
|
| |
Even the latest helicopter air-drops of water seem to be
very few and far-between, and are made from too great a
height to have any effect. Dose rates above the reactors
are said to be on the order of 100mSv/hr, which means
that a fatal dose would be received in 10 hours. I can't
believe that the danger to a pilot at low altitude for two
minutes would be significant, even though it would be
above "recommended" levels. |
|
| |
On the other hand, there are probably too many armchair
experts on this one, and not enough information. Best
wishes and best of luck to them. |
|
| |
/probably too many armchair experts/ |
|
| |
All these robots doing our bidding for all these years but along comes a little radiation and where are they? |
|
| |
Come down off the furniture. |
|
| |
would snow drop into place better than water? |
|
| |
//snow// Comparatively larger ice pellets would drift less than water and be far superior in terms of temperature inhibition. |
|
| |
What I don't get is why they're using helicopters instead of real water-bombers. |
|
| |
I would tell GE the reactors are obviously defective (ie, on fire) and to pick them up. |
|
| |
there is no way that sewers connect to the inside if the containment area. |
|
| |
O/T, but related - My brother mentioned something the otherday akin to this idea. He said, "Do you know why the helicopters are missing their target when dropping water? (they can't fly close enough... due to the radiation)..."Well," he said, "why don't they just put another 200m of line on the bucket?" |
|
| |
//they can't fly close enough... due to the radiation)// |
|
| |
But that's not (as far as I can tell) true anyway. The quoted
doserates (though, who knows if they're correct) above the
reactors would not pose significant danger to a helicopter
pilot who was over them for only a few minutes in total,
which could equate to several flights by each pilot. I just
think they're being too by-the-book in a very out-of-the-book
situation. Either that, or the situation is very different from
what we are being told. |
|
| |
/ there is no way that sewers connect to the inside if the containment area / |
|
| |
where does the hot water usually go, then? Probably a dedicated sewer or outflow pipe to the ocean. This is why they put these things close to the ocean: a place to get cool water and get rid off hot water. |
|
| |
the sanitary sewer system is not used to cool the plant. Under normal conditions in a wet boiler plant the water used in the boiler that "cools" the rods is condensed and re-circulated. This water is "hot" and hopefully never escapes the plant. A second body of water acts as a heat sink. If the container around the rods is damaged by an explosion it no longer functions to condense the steam that is naturally and apparently persistently produced by the rods. This also means that the atmosphere above the rods is not purged of oxygen by steam pressure allowing for H2 explosions. The order of events must have gone something like this IMHO : |
|
| |
3) Circulation pumps fail |
|
| |
4) Control rods lowered fully to begin reactor shutdown |
|
| |
5) Reactor continues to boil as would be expected |
|
| |
6) Leakage somewhere allows pressure out of the core,
boiling increases, circulation decreases, air enters. |
|
| |
7)Rods, still submerged, are boiling at above safe
temperatures (much like a car with a failed radiator cap)
and emitting H2. Normally this would bubble safely away in the cooling pool. However the core is now contaminated with Oxygen. Always this is an emergency. Likely all resources to purge the core are immediately used. To little avail, an explosion occurs, likely at the site of the leak. Leak worsens. |
|
| |
8) The containment of the core is further damaged. Boiling is now runaway and the levels drop below the top of the rods. |
|
| |
9) Rods are now melting. Adding water to the core is a desperate attempt to prevent the core from melting down into a shape that defeats the control rods and leads to an explosion. If the core is kept cold enough it may subside in time. If not it will melt down, and with no additional input explode. |
|
| |
We passed the "when will we get this under control" point two days ago. We are solidly in the "this plant is fucked, lead casket and all". Even circulation of water in the plant may not be enough. If the plant is brought under control will find out how many rods melted how much, but conditions may exist in the core at this moment that would make an explosion inevitable. INEVITABLE. Scary thing about exponential processes. |
|
| |
if the control rods are raised it's a little counter intuitive but so be it. 1-4 seem to have happened at the same time. while it is possible that the pumps had failed before the earthquake it seems more likely that they either could not be powered or that debris in the system clogged them immediately. The fact is that once the rods get hot (atomically and thermally) they self excite to a degree that without effective cooling they will melt themselves. Critical to making an efficient reactor. The other side is that cooling must never ever fail. You must be able to cool the reactor for days, even weeks, before the thing can be considered shut down. |
|
| |
//while US UAVs observe from above// |
|
| |
Hung over operator turns up at the drone centre "Jeez, never seen this part of Afghanistan before..ah whatever." then leans on the fire button looking for somewhere to put the coffee. which would explain all those subsequent explosions... |
|
| |
As for the length of the line, looks difficult (see link) and those black Chinooks are just the regular army helicopters, so not a lot of practice with water carrying. |
|
| |
As for more major support, like offshore ships/aircraft carrier I'm guessing that it's a possibility that more tsnuamis are expected. The reactor then getting hit by a wave, which is carrying a nuclear powered aircraft carrier, isn't a very appealing prospect. |
|
| |
Why couldn't they splice the power cables.
Just hack the plug off on one and splice
them? |
|
| |
Impure water is p
art of the problem, from my understanding. |
|
| |
Power plant was guarded against horrific catastrophes, all.
Earthquake- backup deisel commits the shut down. |
|
| |
Tsunami, internal power acheives the shutdown. |
|
| |
these motors don't plug in. They are massive, with control and starting circuits to match. Starting a motor of this size required that the complete divorced starting circuit is present and that the appropriate voltage phase and current is present. I assume that either the starting circuits were damaged, making starting the pumps using generators impossible, or that all was fine with generators and starting circuits and the pumps were clogged, or obstructed by broken valves, blocked screens etc. |
|
| |
It was a water pump that needed the power. Perhaps I fail to
grasp the scale. |
|
| |
/the sanitary sewer system is not used to cool the plant./
one last thing on this - the rationale behind this idea came from the fact that they were using firehoses and helicopters to splash water around on the outside of these reactors in hopes some of it would go inside then make its way to the right place to be useful. I am sure loads bounced off the sides of the structure and wound up in the shrubbery. |
|
| |
Presuming that somewhere inside the building is a sewer line, at least the use of this line would ensure that applied water went into the building, somewhere. |
|
| |