h a l f b a k e r yClearly this is a metaphor for something.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
An autocomplete system that checks back and adjusts
recommendations based on the latest entry in a typed
sentence, particularly for virtual keyboards
xkcd: Swiftkey
http://xkcd.com/1068/ [hippo, Sep 16 2015]
[link]
|
|
umm... when I type into my search bar in the browser, the list of possible completions changes with every keystroke. Is that what you mean ? |
|
|
Computer thinks "Why is he using a different password just because bank robbers are standing behind him ? |
|
|
I know the right password. I will just help him out. " |
|
|
no FT, I don't mean choose a different sentence as google
might, I mean choose a different word among the previously
typed ones when guessing at what
I typed (for instance when using Swype on a phone). |
|
|
As in the example above, it guessed well (when I wanted
we'll) -- and could have figured it out when I further typed
"see" |
|
|
I think this idea would be better named something
like "retrospective autocomplete", since the novelty
here is re-visiting autocompleted words in the light
of later ones. |
|
|
However, one problem is that if it gets it wrong,
you'd have to go further back to fix it manually. |
|
|
I think [theircompetitor] is going to go back and change this idea in the light of the annotations |
|
|
strange, I typed touché but it completed ass :) |
|
|
[Ian] Swiftkey already does this, almost - see link |
|
|
It's really difficult to understand what this idea is. I think I have it from the annos but perhaps you could be more descriptive? |
|
|
I'd like this, especially if it could make retrospective
corrections back to the mid 80's. |
|
|
I liked this idea, but in retrospective even more. |
|
|
To your point, mb, would be an interesting step
towards dwim if previous messages and even
message target were part of context |
|
| |