h a l f b a k e r yIf you can read this you are not following too closely.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
What [shift] says. This idea is about a remote control system and the linked idea is about a pre-programmed system. While the two use some common elements the results are quite different. |
|
|
Yeah, but it's still a collar-mounted cat guidance system,
pretty half baked. OK, the control is different, but the
results are the same: everybody laughing until they get
bored, or the cat t-bones a doorway (I swear that wasn't
me). |
|
|
Hmm. I'm undecided on this. Thanks for confusing me [oxcross]. |
|
|
I'm confused by the words "cat" and "control" appearing in the same phrase. |
|
|
"....... and runs off only three car batteries." |
|
|
Now, if the laser were powerful enough to fry oncoming cats ........ |
|
|
The linked idea specifically refers to "remote control" as well as programming, though is a little vague about what it does (pattern control? - that could well mean directional control, which is how I interpeted it). Clearly this is the same concept, putting a laser on a cat's collar with remote control. |
|
|
[bristolz], always happy to confuse--maybe you'll catch up
with me; I'm still sort of confused by most of what I read
here... |
|
|
I'm with DrC, this idea would make a good annotation to
the original, in my opinion (qualified: (1) confused) |
|
|
I'd buy one for every cat in my house. It'd be GREAT! You'd keep it down in front of them so their heads are down watching the laser, and then once they get close to another cat, guide them to it, and *BAM* instant cat fight! + |
|
| |