h a l f b a k e r yFaster than a stationary bullet.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
The Rate of Change Thermometer would show the temperature by sliding a small bar up and down a vertical scale. The slope of the bar would indicate the rate of change of temperature over the period of five or ten minutes. If the bar slopes up then it's getting warmer, down and it's getting colder.
How
it could work (1): The expensive (and pretty) analogue way. Two bimetallic strips indicate the temperature. One is bigger and thicker than the other and is therefore slower to react to temperature changes. The two strips are geared up so that the lightweight pointer is moved by a large amount for every small change in the strips. The Thermometer is factory callibrated by the position the strips are attached to the pointer.
How it could work (2): The cheap digital solution. Put a digital thermometer, a small signal processor with a clock, a stepper motor and a few cogs, gears and assorted bits of metal in a box. Assemble as seems fit.
[link]
|
| |
And a resistor. Them being futile, and all. |
|
| |
The analogue method is really clever. I like it. Is it your own? |
|
| |
Does it move or run away by itself? If it doesn't it should. |
|
| |
Rotating-disc thermographs have been baked for a while in industrial plats, but this sounds nice. A scrolling false-colour display would be the thing. |
|
| |
If the rate of temperature change over the last five or ten minutes is enough to show up on a bar graph, I would suggest closing the door. With central heating/cooling, your house should be comfortable all day, and this device would only serve to settle kids' squabbles. |
|
| |
I would go for a charting thermometer, though, especially for my greenhouse. |
|
| |
The analog version is quite nice. |
|
| |
Does this really indicate rate of change or is it really the direction, trend, of change? |
|
| |
Does the necessity for such an instrument really matter, [dalek]? The novelty of the idea is enough for me. |
|
| |
//bris: Does this really indicate rate of change...//
ish. |
|
| |
//dalek: ...last five or ten minutes..//
You may have a point there. In which case, I'd make the big bar bigger and go for half an hour instead. |
|
| |
//dalek: I would go for a charting thermometer...//
No problem. It's all a matter of taste anyway. |
|
| |
"ish?" You no like my comment? |
|
| |
bristolz: as described, the slope would indeed indicate the rate of change (as well as the direction, of course). |
|
| |
Bris: I could have said, "The slope of the pointer approximates rate of change at a point in time between the mean time taken by each bar to react on a scale defined by the mechanism of the thermometer." I thought, "ish." said all that more succinctly. It wasn't a critisism. Meh. |
|
| |
A few more ideas:
1. Use one bi-mettalic strip, but make the pointer very bendy and put it in clear gel. The end of the pointer will take longer to move, and so it will show a curve.
2. Use two mercury thermometers, with different time constants (i.e. one big, one small). Very similar to the proposed idea. |
|
| |