h a l f b a k e r yIf you need to ask, you can't afford it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
What if by typing a special prefix, you can quickly use premade/'user editable' code from a general snippet database (e.g. a wiki in codebank.python.org). Which when the script is run, it quickly downloads the script as needed, and interprets it as if it was a function.
What this means, is that scripts
are kept smaller, and more compact, as any needed functions are simply downloaded from the wiki. (and also any updates and fixes can be found there, along with the function's help page.)
Coding time is also cut down, as people are more inclined to use ready made code that is collectively used. And if you want to make it offline proof, it won't be too hard to create a 'compile' setting, that downloads and integrate all the scripts from the wiki into the script being 'compiled'.
Applications: Best used for webapps.
Syntax form may look like this:
_##_pow(10,3) - finds the first code for 'pow'
_#v1.2#_pow(10,3) - finds a specific version of 'pow'
_#HASH:ndkafeik#_pow(10,3) - enforced specific version of 'pow' by hash function for security purpose.
-----
Note: you might want to also create a local cache, for functions that are downloaded. So that you can use it offline, and allow other similar program to use it.
ChinesePython
http://en.wikipedia.../wiki/ChinesePython
[Spacecoyote, Aug 26 2010]
Colt Python
http://www.imfdb.or...7e/Coltpython25.jpg
My mother's first purse gun... [normzone, Aug 26 2010]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
I know this is baked somewhere, but I can't remember what it's called. |
|
| |
Interesting and potentially full of security holes. |
|
| |
That being said, I'd recommend the syntax of |
|
| |
from ##pow#1.2 import pow |
|
| |
from ##example.com/snippets#pow1.2 import pow |
|
| |
as the syntax so that you can get done with your online portion at the import statement. |
|
| |
Whitespace-fluffed bun for the concept |
|
| |
_##_pinin(10,3), _##_fjords(10,3) |
|
| |
Would make for fragile code. Your program could be
absolutely bullet proof, unit tested to within an inch of its
life, working fine for two years, and then develop a bug
because of something some guy somewhere on the
internet did. And if you think it's hard to deal with
dependency hell by hand, just try writing software robust
enough to handle it automatically at runtime. |
|
| |
I'll say this much in support of the idea, though: if you're
going to do this, Python is the right language for it.
Another way of looking at this -- not what you mean, I
realize, but which I find attractive -- is as an idea designed
to give software engineers nightmares: like Brainf*ck or
the "comefrom"
statement. |
|
| |
What makes Python the best language for this?
Wouldn't Perl be just as good? |
|
| |
To do it with Perl, one would simply need to
define a subroutine named "AUTOLOAD" that
fetches the desired snippets over the internet
and uses eval() to turn them from text into code. |
|
| |
To avoid nightmarish security holes, one could use
the Safe module. There are still security holes,
because Safe isn't perfect, but they're not so large
you could drive a bus through them. (The security
holes are pet door sized -- some contortionist
skills required.) |
|
| |
Fragility might be an issue, but if the internet
code snippets are maintained by individuals with
ownership over those snippets, and those
individuals wrote them for the purposes of helping
their fellow programmers, it's unlikely that the
code snippets would be "upgraded" without first
doing some backward compatibility tests. |
|
| |
Incidentally, this vaguely similar to how Perl
programs which depend on other people's Perl
modules... well, except that those other people's
modules are downloaded (typically from CPAN)
when the program in question is installed, instead
of on the fly. |
|
| |
Would be great for cases where the drop-dead ship deadline is before the specs are written. |
|
| |
Like tax software, for example. |
|
| |
[goldbb] What I had in mind is this:
Python makes a fetish of having nearly everything happen
at run time, even some things, like binding identifiers to
executable code, where you might not expect that. This
makes it easy to intercept function calls at runtime for
purposes of doing what this idea suggests. I think you'd
create stub objects with custom __call__ methods (or
write a factory for such objects). Those methods would
invoke wget or curl or somesuch. |
|
| |
However, maybe Perl also does these things at runtime,
but without making so much fuss about it. Haven't done
much with Perl for a long time, but my impression was:
*any* feature that the practical programmer might find
convenient is already built in, *especially* if the
theoreticians think it's a bad idea. |
|
| |
I agree with the rest of what you say, namely (as I
paraphrase it) that this'll need something very like a
package management system and a codebase specially
organized for this purpose. As for the 'Safe' module, won't
the 'taint' marker infect pretty much your entire program? |
|
| |
Some Perl packages with large numbers of
subroutines are designed so that each of those
subs is only compiled when it's first called, and
kept in memory thereafter. This is done because
it's not to uncommon for a Perl program to load a
package only to use one or two subroutines from
it. There's no point in wasting time compiling any
subroutine that's not going to actually be used,
and there's no way to know that a subroutine
*will* be used, until the program actually goes and
tries to use it. |
|
| |
Of course, while the packages themselves *could
be* downloaded at runtime, they normally aren't...
that would be silly. |
|
| |
As for perl's Safe module: |
|
| |
Data returned from code evaluated in a Safe isn't
automatically marked with the taint flag. |
|
| |
Even if it were, taint can be removed from any
string, by performing regular expression matching
on that string and then getting (untainted) bits
and pieces from $1, $2, etc. |
|
| |
For one thing, Python's developers seem to be more open to drastic "enhancement" than Perl's. |
|
| |
Another thing this kind of approach would be fantastic for, is when you want to make a competitor to matlab. |
|
| |
You know how big matlab is? About a few gigs big. |
|
| |
And while all the functions matlab has is important. I highly doubt we often touch all of them in one program. If python maths (though, srly, their matrix notation plainly sucks, matlab syntax is more intuitive) |
|
| |
With this approach, you can store all the useful mathematical function into the clouds, and simply retrieve it as needed. And if you developed something cool, e.g. a better differentiation function, then you can simply upload it to the server for others to use as well as yourself. |
|
| |
OK I don't get it. how will waiting to connect with an exterior server to download a tiny piece of code speed page load time? This is going around your ass to get to your elbow. As for the other benefits I don't see any. If you want your scripts to be corrupted and frequently cause slow loading and page hangs then host them on a wiki (13kb OutRef'ed to a public server? WTF!) |
|
| |
Spacecoyote, is there anything in Python that's as drastic as Lingua::Romana::Perligata? |
|
| |
WcW, I'm not saying that this will save speed time in processing power. I'm saying this will cut down development time. |
|
| |
This is because, it cuts down the number of time people have to reengineer, a specific function that someone else have probably already did in their own programs. |
|
| |
To make it even better, this approach would make web scripting more wiki-like. This is since, these casual programmers won't have to deal too much with 'dependencies' and can use ready made functions to 'just get the damnn job done'. Hence sites which allows users to create online scripts will benefit from it. |
|
| |
hopefully this approach to programming will help make casual programming more of a lego game, rather than a mechanics nightmare. |
|
| |
//casual programming// I'll concede my own criticism (and
others' too, I think) boils down to saying that this would only
work for casual programming. I'd define "casual" in this
instance as something quick & dirty that will run only once or
twice and not be maintained. I'd bet a lot of programming
falls in that category. |
|
| |
Actually you are onto something. But I propose a
modification. You don't want your code
dependent on the website all the time. As others
have mentioned it causes problems for
performance and for security. How about a
compromise. Make your quick and dirty design
"online" and then once ready to roll out, run a
"get-dependencies" command that will look for all
the dependencies, and store them in a local library
cache.
That will give you the best of both worlds.
Because bringing the libraries ahead of time is a
huge time waster. Sometimes you'll find that the
library doesn't do what you thought it did, so it
never gets actually included in the code. Once it
does, so sure bring it in locally. |
|
| |
So you mean, have a external program that when activated, scans the code, and preloads all the web based functions? (you distribute it with the code as well) |
|
| |
If its a massive file, wouldn't it take a while to download all the functions? |
|
| |
And since functions are likely to be reused by multiple programs, it would be good to have a common local offline cache. |
|
| |
Strange sites lying on servers distributing functions is no
basis for a system of programming. |
|
| |
[Max], Sounds like a cellular mechanism. :-) |
|
| |
Max, what about Sourceforge, CPAN, JSAN , and
other online sources of code and coding tools? |
|
| |
Spacecoyote, that's not a Chinese language plugin
for Python, it's a complete reimplementation of
Python, written in C, using Chinese language
keywords and Python syntax. It's a replacement
for Python, not an add-on. |
|
| |
If you have Perl, and want to write programs in
Latin, simply using the Lingua::Romana::Perligata
package from within Perl will allow you to do it.
You don't need to compile anything from C, since
the package is written in entirely in Perl. |
|
| |
If one desired to write Perl using Chinese language
names and keywords, that too would be possible
with Perl, without needing to create a separate
Chinese Language version of Perl. You'd need to
write a translating package, of course, but the
translator would be written in Perl, just as
Lingua::Romana::Perligata is. |
|
| |
[goldbb] One could write such a translator for Python in
Python, but it's more a Perl thing to do. Pythonistas would
consider that a stinging indictment of Perl. Now, if you want
something that's that's truly more possible in Perl than in
Python, I'd nominate: poetry that parses without errors. |
|
| |
//Max, what about Sourceforge, CPAN, JSAN , and other
online sources of code and coding tools? // |
|
| |
Indeed, but what about Monty Python and the Holy Grail? |
|
| |