h a l f b a k e r yThese statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
The front of this toilet would be the familiar size and shape.
The bottom of the toilet would consist of a wide basin. When
the flush button is pushed:
A: A motor operated lever
would push the contents into a wide vertical pipe with no
bends nearby.
B: The pipe itself would be flushed
by
pumping a surge of water above potential blockage.
C: A
bit of scented cleaning fluid would be pumped around the
basin.
D: A very light second flush would rinse out the
basin.
Toilets with pneumatic ejector pumps
http://www.nytimes....y.html?pagewanted=2
[mouseposture, Apr 16 2011]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
Uses less water, but more electricity. |
|
| |
You could operate it with a large lever for flushing
but mine will be electric. |
|
| |
Can you work in a scissor-arm boxing glove or perhaps
miniature coal cars? |
|
| |
Can't imagine what cleaning this moving lever would be like... |
|
| |
One could adapt this so as to use no moving parts - the contents of the toilet fall with gravity into the wide vertical pipe with no bends. Such a toilet would not require water, either. The bit of scented cleaning fluid could stay, and also a moon carved in the door for ventilation. |
|
| |