h a l f b a k e r yKeep out of reach of children.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
We all have received those videos by email or seen on YouTube with people having accidents. Some are hilarious, others could be if it wasn't so obvious that the people involved either had serious injuries or even died. This functionality would allow each scene to be classified according to a pain/consequence
scale from 0 - Didn't hurt to 10 - Died, including levels for broken limbs, paraplegic and tetraplegic.
Dismount Games
http://jet.ro/dismount/
A person is enouraged by the user to "dismount" from various positions, the more pain, the better the score. [zen_tom, May 31 2012]
Insect equivalent scale
http://en.wikipedia...dt_Sting_Pain_Index
Pain level of insect bites [PainOCommonSense, May 31 2012]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Who annotates? Every youtube video I see where something bad happens, there are an equal number of people saying "cmon guys they dyed" and "glad nobody got hurt!!!11one!" Sometimes it is hard to figure out what the aftermath actually was. |
|
| |
The rating should combine standard biofeedback
measurements from people watching the video with
standard measurements that can be mined from the
video, (eg: body part x which has a hit point rating of
y came into contact with an object that had z
dimensions and a q surface and probably weighed w
amount, at y miles per hour etc.) This could be
combined with real life measurements to standardize
pain. great idea. you are all still going to hell. |
|
| |
Reading a [beanie] idea = 11-15 |
|
| |