h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Won't work in shopping malls, railway stations, airports... [-]. |
|
|
Besides, the bad guys will simply hide in the nondescript, smelly, unphotogenic corners and doorways that no-one ever photographs. |
|
|
I'm not sure if this is an [m-f-d] "Let's all" |
|
|
//Google StreetView is just about as dangerous as it gets// You want to ban something because The Terrorists might find it handy? |
|
|
I can plan a gruesome Terrorist attack using pen and paper, do we ban those things too? I heard you can use something called a camera - shhh! The terrorists are out there, reading this. Quick, ban the internet! |
|
|
IM(not-so-H)O, the idea is fine, with the exception of the last paragraph, in which you are talking abject bollocks. |
|
|
WIGTTISITM - Batman? ok it's photos instead of radar but still pretty similar. |
|
|
Edit: ok actually it's not, but it is simply taking something that millions of people already have and giving it to everyone, then removing their privacy. |
|
|
Anyway, this is already becoming pretty standard on phones (Nokias particularly, see Nokia Vine). |
|
|
//Won't work in shopping malls// you can do rough geotagging using triangulation. My phone does not have GPS but it still tells me which area I'm in to within a couple of hundred metres. |
|
|
I don't see it myself. A burglar or terrorist only has to walk around his target area with a mobile phone, pretending to talk, discreetly taking pictures, and he will have as much information as he would get from google streetview. |
|
| |