h a l f b a k e r yThis is what happens when one confuses "random" with "profound."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
oil is everywhere. Some level of seepage is accepted, even in modern cars (this seepage lubricates the seal, extending its life). Oil wouldn't trigger a "water" sensor. I really dislike adding finicky expensive "features" to cars that the users will just be confused by and where the money could have been better spent on simply making the components more robust. BONES |
|
|
Hence the infrared sensor. The IR light is aimed at a shiny piece of metal at the very bottom of the car. When nothing is on top of it the light return will be very high. If water gets on there the return would be lower, but still withing parameters. But add some dark oil or other colored fluid and it trips the warning light. |
|
|
Well I like the IR sensor idea. Different substances have different IR spectrum absorption characteristics, and the receiving sensor could undergo frequency sweeps to analyse which specific frequencies have been absorbed. A computer database then identifies the measured substance based on its absorption characteristics. Similar techniques are used to separate various plastics in recycling centres. [+] |
|
|
The undertrays fitted to road cars have, of neccesity, drain features which prevent them from filling up with water. This works just as well with any fluid, so the problem you're trying to solve doesn't exist. |
|
|
Oil spill is often on a very small scale, small enough to become bound to dust&dirt on the undertray, never dripping down. I like the 'something should be done' - aspect of the idea, the 'something' is a little quarterbaked, though. |
|
| |