h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Port the OS X GUI (Aqua only, mind you) to Linux as an X11 client. Include an emulator so Linux can run Mac apps.
(I would pay Steve Jobs money for a package like this.)
Mac OS X for Intel
http://www.osx86project.org Run tiger from your own Intel PC [ixnaum, Aug 26 2005]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
Rods, could you run Lindows on your iBook then? |
|
|
Yet another set of annos' where I need Babelfish. |
|
|
Question for [Rods]: just because *you* won't use it, why would you vote against it? |
|
|
But wouldn't you like to be able to run iTunes or some other such legendarily easy-to-use program on your Linux PC? |
|
|
Besides, the emulator is NOT the main part of the idea; the idea is to port the GUI of OS X to Linux. |
|
|
Just what Linux needs, another competing GUI. |
|
|
Hm, what do I yell when my whole Bingo card is covered? |
|
|
If the scenario you described happens soon, I'd probably buy it. (Unless it's open-source.) |
|
|
I sure hope that if it ever happens, it's open-source! |
|
|
That's what I meant. If it was open-source, it'd be better, and free. |
|
|
This is more of a request :-) |
|
|
But ya it would be nice. Although you can do a variation of you are saying - today. Now you don't need a Mac to run Mac OS X. See the Mac OS X for Intel link. |
|
| |