h a l f b a k e r yWhy did I think of that?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Background: There are 2 methods of landing an aircraft in
a crosswind.
The first is the crab. The wings are held level and the
rudder is used to counter the force of the wind. This puts
the aircraft onto the runway in a sideways position and can
cause damage to the landing gear and a loss
of control on
roll-out.
The second, preferred, method is the forward slip. The
upwind wing is dropped to maintain a counter to the wind
and the rudder is used to maintain a runway heading. The
landing causes you to land on the upwind wheel first with
the upwind wing barely above the runway. (The Chinese…
or, “One Wing Low” method)
I have used the forward slip when flying into KHAF where
the runway runs North and South (30 & 12) and the winds
are always off the ocean at a brisk clip. On windy days, the
upwind wingtip is less than a foot from striking the
runway.
The idea of the forward slip is that you are killing lift in
one wing. So my idea is to have a trim tab in the cockpit
with would retract the upwind wingtip a few inches, killing
lift but keeping the aircraft level. The trim tab could
shorten the span with a flick of the finger and then the
rudder could be used to maintain centerline control. With
decreased drag on the upwind wing, the drag on the
downwind wing would be greater and there would be a
yawing effect to the downwind wing and rudder pressures
would also be diminished. No crab and no low wing.
I would think that a decrease of just a few inches of span
would be enough. Landing would be straighter and flatter.
Robin DR-400
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_DR400
A docile little aircraft. [8th of 7, Apr 06 2010]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
" retract the upwind wingtip a few inches, " |
|
| |
I love it, if only for it's stress effect on aircraft inspectors. |
|
| |
Surely to maintain a straight line over the ground, you need to be making an angle to windward through that air? i.e. slipping sideways in the direction the wind is coming from. Obviously the two 'standard' methods you suggest cause the aeroplane to slip sideways through the air, but it is not clear that your plan does. |
|
| |
i.e. to prove this idea works, fly straight and level in still air, and then pull the switch. Does the aeroplane crab sideways, and if so, why? |
|
| |
why not a pair of fins on the top and bottom of the plane at the nose and the tail that can steer the plane slightly in the vertical axis? This would allow for a slight strafe while maintaining the plane's level stance. |
|
| |
Other solutions might be: |
|
| |
Differential flap deployment - like the elevator trim wheel, but for "unbalancing" the flaps by a small, controlled amount. |
|
| |
Spoilers on the upper mainplane might achieve the same thing. |
|
| |
At the point all this is happening you're going to be down into the ground effect which makes it all rather more complicated. |
|
| |
Or get a Robin (DR-400) or similar with a marked dihedral on the wing tips. |
|
| |
I'm sure I have seen a '30s photo of a 'plane with castoring main wheels as well as castoring tailwheel, to allow the 'crab' method described first in the idea. I understand it made steering on the ground tricky. So instead of allowing the wheels to castor, how about let the pilot manually set them to the drift angle? Then she or he can fly level, steering slightly into the wind, turn a big steering wheel to crank the landing wheels parallel to the runway and land safely and securely at a wonky angle. |
|
| |
The gear is typically placed to transmit the force up into the mainspar and thence to the fuselage. Moving it further out would substantially increase the turning moment at the wing root, possibly causing failure. |
|
| |
I'm not sure I buy the premise. The crab/slip doesn't seek to affect lift on the upwind side, but to course-correct for the deflection caused by a crosswind. |
|
| |
Shortening the upwind wing will reduce lift on that side, but I don't think a crosswind will compensate for it. |
|
| |
(As for castoring wheels, a number of large U.S. Air Force aircraft can land straight down a runway while the aircraft is actually pointing significantly to one side.) |
|
| |
what amazes me is the endless source of experience
present in the HB. I have yet to see a topic that
does not have a number of people with the
experience to comment.... |
|
| |
Disappointed: thought this was going to be an idea to rid the Thames of eriocheir sinensis. |
|
| |
// I have yet to see a topic that does not have a number of people with the experience to comment.... // |
|
| |
Just don't ask about incest. |
|
| |
"What about simply rotating the runway?"
That's what the world needs - a lazy susan airport. |
|
| |
"Tower, Cessna 757GR reporting midfield downwind on 21...er 22...er 23..." |
|
| |
// rotating the runway // |
|
| |
It's called an "Aircraft Carrier". |
|
| |
So, a large circular pond is excavated in the centre of a major city (e.g. in the main park). A retired navy aircraft carrier is installed in the pond. The carrier always faces into the wind; aircraft benefit from steam catapult takeoff and arrestor hook landing. International air service to the centre of the city. The pond can also be used by ducks and pedalos. The economic benefits of such a project could easily pay for replacement of all the world's navies' carriers with updated models, as every city installs a carrier pond. |
|
| |
Phoenix: // (As for castoring wheels, a number of large U.S. Air Force aircraft can land straight down a runway while the aircraft is actually pointing significantly to one side.) // |
|
| |
And if I remember rightly, the X-31 could actually *fly* that way as well :-) |
|
| |
I really think that a front stabilizer similar to the one on the
tail but mounted underneath the nose would be an effective
solution. The two working together could trim out the side
wind and allow the pilot to land as in a calm. The pilot lines
up for the landing, trims out the horizontal drift with a lever
that shifts both the rear and front stabilizer a few degrees
off center, then lands as normal using the foot pedals to
shift the rear stabilizer as normal (from it's new false center
position, the front stabilizer would stay put.) |
|
| |
I fly Galway-Luton a lot on a turboprop. The preferred landing method in a crosswind (in Galway, that's always) is the crab for some reason. I don't like it - it can visualise the plane tipping as the wheels take control and set it straight. Fix it. |
|
| |