h a l f b a k e r yYeah, I wish it made more sense too.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
With NASA talking about going back to the moon and spending at least $100 billion to get there, a lot of people question what's in it for me. Well, NASA teams with a Television producer and does a show with the winner getting to join the team going to the moon. The contest would begin with a national
lottery to select finalists. Do it American Idol style tour where people have to come to a location to buy their $10 chance to be finalist. (Maybe just do this part as a promotion - anyone would be able to buy tickets anywhere though). On the tour they get to meet real astronauts and find out about spaceflight and rocket scientists from real people in the field. You see people talking about their love of spaceflight, and getting pumped up for going to the moon. After selecting finalists, the show shifts to a "Space Camp" type venue, where the finalists compete in training to find out who is able to meet the challenges of being able to go into flight. The winner gets to join in the adventure of going to the moon. Money collected from the lottery and the sponsorship of the show would pay for the extra person, and that person would have to document their trip to the moon for broadcast if\when they made it back.
I think this sort of reality TV\personal adventure would get people excited about space again.
(??) Recently baked.
http://www.cnn.com/....ride.ap/index.html
But winner could not afford the taxes. [Galbinus_Caeli, Jan 29 2007]
Florida lottery rejects space flight as prize (2003)
http://www.cnn.com/...ttery.ap/index.html
"It was an intriguing enough concept to present to our focus groups ... but people like to win cash." [jutta, May 06 2008]
Endemol: Space Cadets (2005)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Cadets
Reality TV. Participants are convinced they're in space; actually, they're in a simulator. [jutta, May 06 2008]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Throw in some education about paragraph breaks and you can count me in...I've got ten bucks. |
|
| |
Wow. That'd be the opportunity of a
lifetime. [+] |
|
| |
Space exploration is one of the few things too expensive for reality tv to pay for. Every little helps though, so here's my $10. And a pastry. |
|
| |
Not everyone with $x would make a suitable astronaut. |
|
| |
Break a fifty?
Nevermind, give me five. |
|
| |
That's the point [phoenix], that's why you do an X-Factor / American Idol sort of show where you find the best candidate out of 100,000 odd entrants. |
|
| |
Right - the lottery would get you in the running, but you would still have to "fight it out" with lets say 20 contenders to see who the most capable is. And with part of the missing being to document\report - maybe you include some public voting - that way you at least get some charisma \ screen presence. |
|
| |
//do an X-Factor / American Idol sort of show where you find the best candidate // In the case of American Idol, the least worst candidate. |
|
| |
Seesh. More NASA propoganda. |
|
| |
Bun. Here is my issue with this though: The economics are all wrong. The going rate for a trip to space is $20 million dollars. A US millionaire just paid that amount to go up to the space station with the Russian space program. So you can put on this contest and hope you get 2,000,000 people to pitch in $10 each or you can set your rate at $20 million and start fishing for millionaires. But anyway... |
|
| |
I wasn't thinking you could pay the whole way for someone, although I think there are enough people who would buy multiple chances. I was thinking that by adding an element of including the public (those who want to be included) and broadcasting the "contest" you would create excitement. You are also not taking into account fees that NASA could collect from show sponsors - I imagine that a network might pay for the priviledge, sort of like paying for broadcasting the Olympics. Even if it did not fully pay for itself - the PR would give NASA a shot in the arm. |
|
| |
-------------- --------------- --------------- --------------------
"Seesh. More NASA propoganda." - ldischler
------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------------
I'm not a even a huge fan of NASAs current direction with the $100 billion trip to the moon. I actually think we should pour half of that into getting a space elevator up and then we could all go for a ride. BUT, with the plan currently to go to the moon, why not send one of "US" up with them and get John Q. Public excited about the endeavor? |
|
| |
Like the teacher in space? |
|
| |
This is a terrible idea. I mean the landing on the moon part, not the idea itself. All it's gonna do is piss off the Moon people even more and they'll attack us again, and we all remember what happened last time. Those of us that survived, anyway. |
|
| |
Sorry I haven't been back in a while - to respond to ldischler - yes sort of like McAuliffe - which was an idea I liked but obviously didn't work out (so sad for her and the rest of the Challenger crew). But, I'm not quite sure where your comment is going - everyone would understand the risks at this point. A few wouldn't go out of fear - many Americans would suppress their fears and worries for a chance to go into space. I think the problem with a McAuliffe-like selection was that it seemed a politcal selection, not something that could happen to Joe Everyone and get them excited. |
|
| |
Question: would I be the first troll in space? I fear my only chance will be if they turn the Moon into a penal colony, but hey, it worked for Australia. |
|
| |
$100 billion cost / $10 per ticket = 10 billion tickets |
|
| |
=1.6 tickets per person ON EARTH.
= about 20 tickets per person in the US |
|
| |
space travel's madd expensive |
|
| |
I'd buy tickets even for the remote chance to sit in on a "routine" ISS trip. |
|
| |
I think it would be fairly easy to sell tickets. But then you'd also have revenue from; TV show advertisers, text msg voting for finalists, video sales from documenting the trip, and whatever else the marketeers could think up.
Big happy bun. [+] |
|
| |
Rough estimates if received almost as well as American Idol: |
|
| |
$100 million for 10 million entry tickets (over a year-long campaign)
$100 million through sponsorship and ads (for a full TV selection season)
$500 million text message voting (Idol TM grossed $532 in '02)
$100 million return book, parapheneilia, movie, misc.
Total: $800 million
50% Margin = $400 million
|
|
| |
Current cost of one NASA ISS space shuttle run is
$600 million. (Almost 30x equivalent privatized standards.) |
|
| |
Even though these numbers are aggressive, partially privatizing this one trip would free up a ton of tax money to put into education and other earthly things. For example, the FIPSE lost $496 mil in May just this year due to added War on Terror money needs. This recouped money could allow them to create more programs that train more people to figure out how to reduce the bloated NASA costs. |
|
| |
sninctown, I agree it is not going to pay the whole way - It will pay a little of the way (1-10% maybe). But if we are going anyway, then it is greatly more than we would have taken in if we hadn't had a lottery. Again - the side benefit being getting people excited about space - feeling there is actually something in it for them. |
|
| |
+ for anything that might get me into space (that'd be worth giving up smoking for) but I agree with the bit about the elevator. All this buggering about with rockets is inefficient and lame; even when the shuttle was flying we didn't have the capacity to shift anything of appreciable size into space. Once we can get an asteriod or two in orbit and a string around one of them getting to the moon will be a piece of cake. |
|
| |
// $100 billion cost / $10 per ticket = 10 billion tickets =1.6 tickets per person ON EARTH. = about 20 tickets per person in the US // |
|
| |
At least they would get a little extra money. |
|
| |
Lots of people like me would purchase multiple tickets. (I'm in for $10/month from now until the drawing!) People who know me might give them to me as gifts, increasing my effective contribution and reducing the number of individuals who have to buy tickets to break even. Gazillionaires might buy in large quantities. |
|
| |
Imagine the Christmas gift-giving ad campaigns! |
|
| |
Yeah, but the winner could not afford the taxes. see link |
|
| |
This idea is some day soon going to become real. |
|
| |
Endemol Productions (a Dutch house) announced a few months ago they were going to make "format" around this. |
|
| |
Which makes one wonder how many people they're going to send up to space. |
|
| |
Oh, it was a hoax. I didn't know! |
|
| |
//The economics are all wrong. The going rate for a trip to space is $20 million dollars.//
$20M only gets you into orbit and back. Going to the moon is not quite as cheap or easy. |
|
| |
someone send this to NASA! |
|
| |
Okay, You've finally found a reality concept I would not only
watch, but like to participate in. Put me down for 10-20
tickets.
I suspect the taxes thing could be worked out, it would
require a federal law passed to authorize this, said law could
make it tax exempt quite easily.
|
|
| |
Do this and I'll actually play the lottery. |
|
| |