h a l f b a k e r yNot from concentrate.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
I think it probably deserves its own fishbone. Digging holes through the moon isn't easy (well, I've never actually TRIED it, but . . . ). A super-long telescope isn't really a good thing, as it gives more distance for optical errors to show up. A moon telescope couldn't be aimed. Speaking of massive: The gravity of the moon, even though less than Earth's, is going to distort the lenses (although if you are never going to move them, you might have a very slight chance of dealing with that). |
|
| |
If you put two lenses out in space, you wouldn't even need a framework between them, if you installed good controls. The lenses could be thin glass shells with dense gas in them . . .. [ ] |
|
| |
[baconbrain]How would you keep them aligned without a frame, wouldn't they just drift apart? |
|
| |
This could get pretty unpleasant during a solar eclipse. |
|
| |
No need to move the moonscope, the Moon moves by itself! No, you couldn't aim it but you would get a lot of targets over the course of a year! |
|
| |
The lenses in [baconbrain]'s telescope could be kept in place with the occasional use of tiny thruster rockets. |
|
| |
//This could get pretty unpleasant during a solar eclipse//
I guess the ants would be laughing. |
|
| |
I thought this was going to be an observatory, built on the airless moon. It's all a bit hot and cold up there, tricky conditions to keep equipment aligned nicely, but it might be worth a try, and space agencies are well used to dealing with rapidly changing extremes of temperature. The windless, low-gravity environment should make construction lighter and simpler than earth bound jobs, accepting all the difficulties of actually getting things to the bloody moon in the first place. |
|
| |
Right, getting to the moon is difficult, and about half the difficulty is landing on it. So just keep going out into space and build the telescope where it can float free. |
|
| |
I only refrained from fishboning this idea as I assumed the raw materials for lenses and such would be mined on the moon. Even then, it would be less work to lift them from the moon to space than to lift a hole-ful of rocks up from the depths of the moon to the surface. |
|
| |
//How would you keep them aligned without a frame, wouldn't they just drift apart? // "Good controls", I said. Geezus H! On tiny thruster rockets, as [hippo] understood. It wouldn't be easy, but it would be a lot better than digging a hole through the moon. |
|
| |
\\ A moon telescope couldn't be aimed.\\ |
|
| |
Actually, it could be, but it would cost a lot of time and resources. |
|
| |
And with the aiming mechanism we could rotate the moon and see the dark side of it. Imagine the armageddon theories that would come out if NASA didn't tell anyone they were doing it and the moon just suddenly changes. |
|
| |