h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This is a system that correlates microexpressions across
videos of interviews. It would correlate individual frames
of microexpressions on the faces of interview
participants
across time. The best way to start would probably be
with
a group of well known people who all know eachother
well
and of whom there are many close up videos of
interviews,
and then correlate the microexpressions statistically to
see
if there is, and then map the history of exchange over
time.
The theory would be that people copy emotions from
eachother. In my own personal experience of watching
myself on video I have noticed that many individual
frames
look unlike me and very much like people I have known
in
my past who have had emotional influences on me. If
you
could correlate this statistically you could get a better
picture of how "thoughts" really happen, that they are
not
original in the way we are conscious of now but are
instead
traded around in a relatively unconscious economy.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
I'd probably start with words rather than
microexpressions. Words often correlate more or less
with what people are thinking. |
|
|
Your naivety is touching. |
|
|
Thank you. I didn't get where I am today. |
|
|
Ah! So _that's_ where it went! I'll call [8th] - time to
test out Tactical Tapas No. 74. |
|
| |