h a l f b a k e r yInvented by someone French.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Is it safe to assume that this is essentially a microwave oven with a set of plastic heat exchanger coils running through the cooking area to heat the water? Interesting concept. I have no idea if this would be any more efficient than ordinary resistive electrical heat, but bun for the concept. |
|
|
A prototype would not be difficult to build, either. Who wants to try it? |
|
|
I think he means to heat people directly. |
|
|
...and take that foil hat off! |
|
|
er. radiation + people is not a good equation. |
|
|
People with tooth fillings will spark at the mouth although now I've written that, I'm unsure if that's a negative point. |
|
|
er. radiation + people = bad equation is a good equation. |
|
|
Actually, radiation + people = eyesight.
Infrared radiation + people = warmth
(i.e., quartz heater). Microwaves +
people = fishbone. |
|
|
I was thinking about a microwave space heater and figured someone must have done one here. And Walla - here it is. Heat wet things, not dry things. I bet that at a distance there would not be that many sparks off of metal but given that I have no idea why that occurs in the oven, it might occur in the living room. |
|
|
I'm certain this would work as a free-standing heater insofar as:
1) people are mostly water, and
2) you're not giving off so much radiation as to boil them. |
|
|
The downside is you're heating the person, not the environment. What does that mean for the rest of the house? Also, small pets might experience...side effects. |
|
|
I'm unsure if it would be more efficient or not. Will the walls of a typical home reflect microwaves? |
|
|
// Also, small pets might experience...side effects// Bun. |
|
|
//more efficient than ordinary resistive electrical heat// |
|
|
Resistor-based electrical heat is essentially 100% efficient in turning electrical energy into heat, so it's hard to improve upon. Any routing through additional stages (E > uwave > heat) will just spread the heat around, generally wasting some. |
|
|
Direct radiant heating is more effective in placing heat where you want it. |
|
|
But direct radiant heating is tough on the piano. |
|
| |