h a l f b a k e r yRIFHMAO
(Rolling in flour, halfbaking my ass off)
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
To slow down speeders near schools, ahead of crosswalks, stop signs, etc. a permanent or electromagnet could be embedded in the roadway. The latter would be activated by radar upon the approach of a speeding vehicle. As the conductive car frame passes through the magnetic field, induced eddy currents
cause an opposing force that slows it. Any current produced could be bled off to the city power grid.
Regenerative braking system for cars
http://www.halfbake...system_20for_20cars
I mentioned a v. similar idea to this in an annotation here [hippo, May 27 2002, last modified Oct 05 2004]
Smart car for stupid drivers
http://www.halfbake..._20Stupid_20Drivers
...and here too. [hippo, May 27 2002, last modified Oct 05 2004]
streetlight motion detectors
http://www.halfbake...20motion_20detector
...and here! I must stop posting this annotation... [hippo, May 27 2002, last modified Oct 05 2004]
Millennium Force
http://www.darkstud...com/c2c/051100.html
Roller coaster at Cedar Point in Sandusky, Ohio. Uses magnetic brakes. [phoenix, May 28 2002, last modified Oct 21 2004]
[link]
|
| |
On the condition that you include safety features to stop the next car plowing into the back end of the slowing vehicle, pastry. |
|
| |
Most cars have magnetic sensors for ignition timing and other engine management functions. A magnetic field capable of appreciably slowing down a car might also incapacitate those systems - and maybe wreck the tyres and suspension due to the extra load on them. |
|
| |
in reference to both the last two annos: serves 'em right for speeding past a school! |
|
| |
Not that I'm advocating speeding, particularly near schools, but...
Have you noticed that, whenever car/pedestrian accidents occur where the car was doing a legal speed and the pedestrian was wandering around like a blind half-wit, the official response is always to reduce the speed limit. |
|
| |
That's the beauty of it. Nothing has to be added to (or can be taken away from) standard makes. The faster or heavier the vehicle, the stronger the braking force acts on it. |
|
| |
I think that what UB meant was that those vehicles are almost entirely fibreglass... |
|
| |
At least the engine and transmission should decelerate. |
|
| |
A magnetic field of sufficient strength might also relieve the little bastards round my neck of the woods of the machettes and flick-knives they come to school armed with. |
|
| |
And, to be fair, that's probably most of the weight right there. |
|
| |
[mwburden] Except for Land Rovers, which are
Aluminium
(The British Government, after World War II
was almost penniless and gave generous tax breaks to
anyone who could bring in export sales. Rover cars
thought they could do this with a general-purpose vehicle
for developing countries - the only problem with this was
that steel was hard to get hold of because it had all been
used up in the war, so they chose aluminium instead) |
|
| |
Anything to stop Mothers in Hummers (ie: the mother dropping off the kids in the Jeep Cherokee, then speeding off, knocking over schoolkids as they go. |
|
| |
I think some annotators are a bit confused about eddy current braking. The affected parts need not be magnetic, but electrically conductive. Aluminum would work just fine. Better in fact because it is more conductive than steel. Fiberglass would be unaffected, however. |
|
| |
The biggest problem is that a sudden, unexpected decrease in speed would probably cause a crash more often that it would prevent one. Startled drivers tend to panic and swerve in unpredictable ways. |
|
| |
"I think some annotators are a bit confused about eddy current braking. The affected parts need not be magnetic, but electrically conductive."
Count me in. How do you grab onto aluminum with a magnet? |
|
| |
Phoenix: the point is, you're not using what you might think of as the magnetic interaction, but an electromagnetic one. remember doing things with motors and dynamos in school? same thing - an electric charge moving through an electric field produces a force sort of thing. When this happens, it can be shown that the force will always oppose a direction of motion. |
|
| |
The thing is, the charge does not have to be in a magnetic medium, so aluminium would be fine too. |
|
| |
I have to admit, i've always been bad at electromagnetics, so pls excuse me if I got something wrong - it's been a while. |
|
| |
Okay, but that implies a path for current flow, doesn't it? |
|
| |
The idea is OK, but I don't trust the government to only put them in front of schools. The next thing you'll see is the technology being sold to retailers trying to get people to stop at their establishments. |
|
| |
Also, what an opportunity for car-jackers! |
|
| |
I think custard would be a better (and tastier!) way to slow down cars. |
|
| |
A magnet that is big enough to stop a car by induction would also likely be big enough to rip all that shrapnel you got in 'Nam right out of your legs. |
|
| |
[angel] As I understand it, the rationale behind lowering the speed limit is to reduce the damage done to aformentioned loony pedestrian when they get hit. Also it reduces your breaking and reaction distance so you would be less likely to hit them. |
|
| |
Last night a lady with a push chair didn't bother looking and walked straight out in front of me, If I'd been going ten miles an hour faster there would now be two more winged harp players. |
|
| |
Perhaps schools should be placed somewhere where there are no roads.... Sigh I can hear people talking about pedestrian zones can't I? |
|
| |
Solves all the problems... mums can't drop there kids off and you can drive as fast as you like. |
|
| |