h a l f b a k e r yLike a magnifying lens, only with rocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
The two main types of rocket propellant
are solid and two-liquid fuels. (There are
also hybrids using a solid fuel and liquid
oxidiser, and monopropellants.)
Solid fuels are simple to use and need
only
simple rockets - basically a tube with a
nozzle at the end. They have the
disadvantages
of being non-controllable
once lit, and being quite costly. Worse
yet,
their specific impulse is not that great.
Two-liquid fuels are typically liquid
oxygen combined with either liquid
hydrogen (best for impulse per unit
weight) or kerosene (best for impulse per
unit volume). The liquids are pumped
into
a combustion chamber, mixed and
burned. This has the advantage of using
cheap fuels and giving a very good
specific impulse. It's also throttlable.
The
drawback is the complexity (=cost,
weight) of the engine.
I suggest a sort of hybrid fuel which
would
have the high impulse of two-liquid
systems, but the simplicity of a solid
rocket. (It would not have the
throttlability of a liquid system, though).
Liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen can
be
mixed, and are fairly stable (at least, they
aren't hypergolic - they don't ignite
spontaneously). Now add a few percent
of
a liquid which will gel at very low
temperatures (might be kerosene) and
mix
(gently). With luck, you will get a semi-
solid gel which is >90% LOX plus liquid
hydrogen. With a bit of luck, this gel will
behave much like a solid propellant (ie, it
will simply burn once lit), but with the
high impulse afforded by the intimate
mixing of LOX and H2.
There are some issues with this. First,
the
gel is going to have to maintain its
temperature by venting, just as LOX or
liquid H2 alone do. This might lead to
the
formation of gas bubbles in the gel. On
the other hand, provided the gel is
surrounded by a porous mesh, boil-off
from the surface should be favoured, and
might prevent the insides from bubbling.
(You might even be able to use a porous,
combustible solid in place of the gelling
agent, soaking the liquids up like a
sponge; I'm thinking of maybe open-cell
porous aluminium or magnesium, or an
open-cell plastic foam.)
Second, the mix may be sensitive to
premature detonation. However, agents
could be added to the gelling agent to
stabilize the mixture (for example, free-
radical scavengers) and make it semi-
stable.
Finally, handling this is going to be a
nightmare - it's going to be a semi-
solid that wants to turn into a gas.
However, there may be some way to
prepare the gel in-situ, by filling the
tank
with the three components and allowing
them to mix and gel in situ.
Sprengel explosives
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyliquit
Been there, done that, dodged the shrapnel .... [8th of 7, May 04 2008]
Messerschmitt Me 163
http://en.wikipedia...esserschmitt_Me_163
Like off a shovel ... [8th of 7, Sep 10 2010]
T-stoff
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-Stoff
Refuse all substitutes. [8th of 7, Sep 10 2010]
Rocket Lab's Viscous Liquid Monopropellant
https://www.google....quid+monopropellant
"a non-Newtonian fluid containing both oxidisers and fuels", according to the patent [notexactly, Feb 27 2019]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
//be able to use a porous, combustible solid in place of the gelling agent, soaking the liquids up like a sponge .............. second, the mix may be sensitive to premature detonation // |
|
| |
[MaxB}, do you want the good news or the bad news ? |
|
| |
This technology is Baked. Unfortunately for your idea, LOX-based explosives using a porous matrix of sintered carbon as the fuel have been around for a while, and have found favour in some semi-fixed applications like quarrying. |
|
| |
Essentially, a prepared "core" of carbon is placed in a polystyrene Dewar, and LOX is poured in. A small booster charge of HE such as blasting gelatin is used to initiate the bulk explosion of the LOX device. It's nearly as cheap as ANFO, but ANFO is safer, and the big downside is the LOX which is a bit of a swine to handle. |
|
| |
Put your LOX gel on the top of your rocket as the payload and you might be getting somewhere ...... |
|
| |
[+] anyway for an overcomplicated and extremely dangerous idea involving powerful oxidisers and combustion. |
|
| |
Hmm. It seems as if such mixtures are
low-brisance explosives, with ignition
propagating by shock rather than heat. I
wonder, though, if a modification of the
solid component (or gelling agent for a
LOX/H2 mix) might stabilize things
enough to permit a slower burn. |
|
| |
p.s. Since you asked, I always want the
good news. |
|
| |
// I wonder, though, if a modification ..... might stabilize things enough to permit a slower burn // |
|
| |
We wonder too. We would very much like to know this. We encourage you to research the subject and do a series of increasingly large practical experiments. Just give us an hour or so, while we nudge our Cube into a slightly higher orbit ....... |
|
| |
Martini fuel come in two mixes: |
|
| |
Vermouth suspended in Gin, which gives a high traditional value but a low score on popularity at launch. |
|
| |
The other is a suspension of the same Vermouth in Vodka. |
|
| |
The VOX gives a lower 'retch' scale with untrained palates but I believe there is a mix which combines the rich, light GIV mix with a mild offset. |
|
| |
I propose a series of gradually reducing flavour tempers such as Cointreau or Apple, which can be reduced and replaced with the more suitable Olive-on-stick suspensions as the night wears on. |
|
| |
The 1954 Gin, Vermouth and Cointreau rinse, combined with an anchovy-laden olive duplex is my suggested optimum fuel. |
|
| |
The entire mixture needs to be kept extremely cold, of course! |
|
| |
Now, THAT is an important chemistry problem solved! |
|
| |
I would mix this stuff very slowly in minute quanities, from behind a rather extensive set of safety barriers....and at a substancial safe distance. Bringing any hydrocarbon into contact with liquid O2 could be rather exciting. |
|
| |
It should be not much worse than mixing
a dry oxidant with a dry fuel (as in
preparing gunpowder). Spontaneous
ignition ought to be inhibited by the low
temperature, methinks. |
|
| |
Yes, [Max] is correct. You need an ignition source...... static electricity will do. |
|
| |
The components of black powder are mixed wet, then dried and "mealed". There are several grades of black powder, "Meal A" is the finest grain and has the highest burn speed, useful for blasting. 4-F BPGP is used in small bore weapons like pistols, and for priming; most long arms use 3-F as their propellant. Slower burn, more sustained gas pressure, higher muzzle velocity, and less chance of the firer ending up with a breechblock passing through their ocular orbit and exiting through the back of the skull (although sometimes they just lose their sight in both eyes, and all the fingers and the thumb on their left hand). |
|
| |
<later>
NB this is not a joke, it is loud and messy and expensive and people come round asking questions, so beware. |
|
| |
I was shocked that the word cold appeared nowhere in this idea. Without a liberal addition of cold this recipe is impossible. |
|
| |
I've just read this idea and it appears to be crap. [-] |
|
| |
Perish the thought. You need to test it before you make such pronouncements. |
|
| |
Don't forget to post links to the video, and the transcript of the fatal accident inquiry. |
|
| |
And here was I expecting it to be made from pureed salmon... |
|
| |
//appears to be crap// Oddly enough, I had exactly that
thought when you described the problem of separating out
gas bubbles from the mass of semisolid/liquid. Cryogenic,
high-energy proctology. |
|
| |
Consider hydrogen peroxide. A liquid, but laden with O! One could dissolve hydrogen into it under pressure, then jelly it with silica or some other nonoxidizable gelling agent. Wear gloves. |
|
| |
I'm sitting here eating a bagel with cream cheese, capers, red onion, tomato, and...lox, and then here is this idea. |
|
| |
//Consider hydrogen peroxide. ... One could dissolve
hydrogen into it under pressure// |
|
| |
Does anyone know the solubility of hydrogen (or, indeed,
hydrocarbons) in hydrogen peroxide? And wouldn't it react
spontaneously? |
|
| |
It might react spontaneously. Probably. |
|
| |
Correct, [bungs]. Hi-test peroxide will react exothermically with many organic compounds ,,, |
|
| |