h a l f b a k e r yYeah, I wish it made more sense too.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
People walking down the middle of the sidewalk doesn't seem to deter the grass/weeds from growing up between the cracks in the sidewalk... Plus, this would result in a generation of children that would only walk in single file lines, which would just be creepy. |
|
|
Welcome to the HB. I like the spirit of this idea, but I can't bring myself to vote for it. |
|
|
That's because there's already that crazy 'don't step on the crack' superstition!
Thanks - Glad to be here |
|
|
Um, what's wrong with grass growing on the sidewalk...? In fact, what's wrong with simply walking on grass instead of the sidewalk? |
|
|
Walking on the grass repeatedly will kill it - that's the whole point ;) Besides without a path we wouldn't go anywhere. |
|
|
Um? What's wrong with walking on the cracks in the pavement?. So long as you count them and 'even them up' on both feet so that your are correctly 'balanced'. I'll get me coat!. |
|
|
Everyone knows that walking on grass inevitably leads to walking on crack and other 'hard' surfaces. |
|
|
If the squares were only rotated every so often, random walks would suffice. |
|
|
If everyone walked on the right edge relative to thier direction of travel, we'd get useful traffic separation. Alternatively you could go the whole hog like they do in Oxford Street in London every Christmas and have one pavement for one direction and the one on the other side of the road for the other. |
|
| |