h a l f b a k e r yGood ideas at the time.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
With the west coast of the United States beginning to suffer a huge power shortage, why don't we look to the prisons for cheap and effective power generation solutions? Don't build more expensive and environmentally damaging power plants! My idea is simple. Hook up hundreds and hundreds of treadmills,
stationary bicycles and hamster wheels to dynamos... and get the inmates of all the prisions in, say, California, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, New Mexico and Arizona, working out on them. The power they generate could be put on the grid in whatever state they prison was in. I mean, come on... if we have to feed these inmates, let's put them to work that won't get them out in public too much. Put them on treadmills! Why, I bet San Quentin prision alone could generate several megawatts a day if we really got this organized. It is cheap and environmentally friendly, too! And the health and rehabilitation benefits to the inmates would be immense... imagine how good you'd look and feel if you spent, say, 8 hours on a treadmill every day for 25 years to life?
[1]
http://www.cdc.stat...facility/instsq.htm San Quentin State Prison [egnor, Mar 31 2001, last modified Oct 04 2004]
[2]
http://www.windstre...npower/hpgtech.html Human Power Generator System [egnor, Mar 31 2001, last modified Oct 04 2004]
Voluntary version.
http://www.halfbake...ed_20Health_20Clubs [jutta, Mar 31 2001]
[link]
|
|
Watts measure power. "Megawatts
per day" is not a sensible unit.
In any case, there are currently
6,121 inmates currently held at
San Quentin. [1] A human pedaling
a bicycle (the most efficient form
of human power generator known)
can produce ~ 100W of continuous
power. [2] Even if you had every
single San Quentin inmate pedaling
away at once, that's only 600kW of
energy. Assuming 8 hours per
prisoner per day (which is
probably generous), that's a net
power output of 200kW. |
|
|
That's probably not even enough to
run San Quentin itself, let alone
add any power to the grid. |
|
|
...and lets not consider the outcome (given the level of crime committed by re-offenders) of giving the criminal poulation an unusually high level of athletic training. C'mon, those donut eating police have a hard enough job catching them in the first place. |
|
|
<g> but, mcscot, dont' we already provide more mundane athletic equipment? Free weights, dumbells, etc? |
|
|
true, I just have a vision of masked, striped-jumpered, swag-bag carrying miscreants declining the getaway car lift because they can already out-cycle most of the traditional modes of pursuit. |
|
|
Perhaps we should sentence them to a number of KW or bicicle miles rather than years. or give points toward parole based on power output. |
|
|
How is this different from the prison slave labor as practiced in previous centuries. I can't believe you would advocate a return to the barbaric practices of yesteryear, what with... |
|
|
They are still using prison labor today? Phone centers, you say? |
|
|
[insert obligatory comment about
turning humans into 'copper tops'
with green glyphs floating by]....
Take the red pill.... |
|
|
The judge could declare the convict to be so - and - so many kilometers away from human society to give the "sentencing them to an amount of kilometers" idea more flavor. |
|
|
I presume you have an idea to punish the white collar criminals more harshly than the blue collar ones. I mean it's only fair. |
|
|
How about: white-collar criminals' bicycles only have one pedal. <g> |
|
|
Remember the matrix??
Hahaha
And have them pedal, just because it would be hard...
Cruel & Unusual you say?
Of course, thats y its a good idea... |
|
|
If you changed the lightbulbs in the prison to compact florescents, there might be some "extra" power. Who cares if there is even a net plus, at least they are reducing the amount of resources they are using from outside the prison. I say they be but to work growing their own food though - much more efficient - no work, no eat! |
|
|
I think this is a step in the right direction. Whatever about the evils of hard labour as a sentence, surely letting convicts sit around doing nothing for their sentences is more harmful than making them work? And even if the power generated wouldn't quite power the prisons, isn't it better that the prisons are nearly self-sustaining electrically? Of course, it doesn't do much to rehabilitate the prisoners, so maybe teaching them some basic skill and then putting them to work at that is better, but generally, I think that the idea of enforced labour is good. Thumbs up. |
|
| |