h a l f b a k e r yCogito, ergo sumthin'
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
I find the current layout of the voting options confusing and cluttered. Too many words are squeezed into this tiny little space.
How about "Vote:<br><big>+<br>-</big>" and "Change vote:<br>null<br><big>+</big>" instead??
Simple (text) icons seem so much more immediately
understandable to use than the current "for" and "against".
To increase ease-of-click the + and - links could be padded by characters on both ends.
[link]
|
| |
Disagree. I think it's fine as it is, but not if erik agrees with ccaamgw and mab disagrees with jutta.| — | Lemon,
Jul 19 2000, last modified Jul 21 2000 |
|
|
| |
So... have we all agreed to agree or agreed to disagree? |
|
| |
The "for" and "against" options are easy enough to read on my browser, but the symbols used in the lists are hard to distinguish. Perhaps coloring the fish red (and maybe coloring the hand green) would help? |
|
| |
LOL. Always was a croissant for me. After all, why is this thing called halfbakery? Hm? Hm? |
|
| |
Jutta -- don't take it pesonally, but the croissant
(clever, given the logo) and the dead fish were not so obvious
the first time I saw them. Now that most of us know what
the icons are and their use, they're just fine. |
|
| |
But supercat did have a good point about coloring
the icons -- but it would take away from your site's
look'n'feel. |
|
| |
I agree with the people who were agreeing with the guy who said they were fine like they are...<grin> I liked the straight fish better than the curved one, but it works as it is...Think the colors, or lack thereof, are cool as they are as well... |
|
| |
I like it the way it is, plain, simple, fast and not to much images. Yeah.. my idea ;) |
|
| |
Don't like them personally (they'd distract from the score icons), but if you had to, what do you do for "retract vote back to neutral"? |
|
| |
Retract to neutral? A hand with the thumb cut off, of
course (blood optional). |
|
| |
I love how the croissant and fish icons look... I think they
are perfect as-is. The only thing I would suggest is a slight
layout change, since the voting options are kind of
bunched up and have funny line breaks (at least on my
setup...) |
|
| |
Perhaps the start of the annotations could be bumped
down slightly to be even with the top of the idea body
text, and then the vote icons and options could be run
horizontally above the annotations column. Does that
make sense? |
|
| |
I both agree and disagree with PotatoStew. I like the icons like they are, and think the compact view is perfect. No need to string them out across the screen unnecessarily, having 'for' and 'against' stacked makes them more accessible. |
|
| |
And the half-croissant/stinkfish are perfect. |
|
| |
Could we have FOR and AGAINST in caps? Easier to see in the screen clutter for high speed word-readers. |
|
| |
Instead of the Christian Loaves & Fishes, could we have a non-sectarian XXX and ticks? Like our teachers did for us in school. |
|
| |