h a l f b a k e r yResident parking only.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I love the cheery text on the linked page: |
|
|
"Nowadays, both armed forces and law enforcement
officers all around the world have to face an
increasing number of peacekeeping and law
enforcement operations, where, very often, the use
of lethal weapons is not always the most
appropriate." |
|
|
I mean "not always the most appropriate", but
presumably, then, at least somewhat appropriate. |
|
|
... and no doubt most convenient, particularly if the culprit* is young, unarmed, in a public place during the hours of darkness, and black. |
|
|
*all culprits are presumed innocent until after the post-mortem. |
|
|
The real beauty of this is that any frozen substance can and should be used as ammo. |
|
|
But here now: for reasons of symmetry it would be most fitting that an ice gun be powered by pressurized steam. |
|
|
Added benefit: you could fire nonlethal rounds by using lower pressure steam. |
|
|
Third benefit: once you were done with your shooting you could steam the wrinkles out of your shooting pants, then do up some dumplings. |
|
|
//the use of lethal weapons is not always the most appropriate// - there is a term used in
law-enforcement which evokes a similar ambiguity: police forces and vendors of police equipment will talk about "less lethal" weapons (see link). I don't like this term because surely either something is lethal or it isn't, it can't be "not quite as lethal". |
|
|
A % of lethalness would be best; a probability of lethality. People would be interested in the high and the low end. It is those intermediate lethalness weapons that are troublesome. |
|
| |