h a l f b a k e r yEureka! Keeping naked people off the streets since 1999.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Don't you hate it when your stereo headphones turn into mono (one-sided) ones, or completely stop working, even though the wire still looks intact from the outside!
(The darn little thin wires wore out again >:-(, even though the strain relief looks pretty durable!)
My solution EXTREMELY obvious:
install a small female mono audio jack on each side of the headphones (or a stereo female jack on one side), preferably 1/8" or 3/32". The cord has either two monural male plugs, or one stereo male plug.
That way, the wire wears out, go buy the replacement cord instead out a whole new pair of headphones.
Also, the cord would twist freely at the jack, extending the cord's life even farther.
(If there is a better type (swivel-able) audio jack, then use it, the idea is "sound"!) Gold-plated would probably be a plus.
I think this would even work with earbuds, some of those earbuds are pretty expensive, wouldn't you rather just replace the cord??
File this under:
So obvious that headphone manufacturers don't want to sell more cheap cords, just more expensive headphones!
(Don't you just love our disposable society??)
AKG studio headphones
http://www.akg.com/...2,_language,EN.html
with replaceable cable, mini XLR, and gold-plated, yay! [jutta, Nov 13 2009]
[link]
|
| |
The cord on some high-end earbuds (e.g. the ER-4* from etymotic) is kind of replaceable. The jacks are two thin pieces of metal sticking out, not sure what those are called. It's expensive and inconvenient; one has to mail in the cable to have them replace it, but there's really no reason to do that - other aftermarket connectors should work just as well. |
|
| |
OK, I'll amend that last sentence:
So obvious that headphone manufacturers don't want to sell more cheap cords, just more expensive headphones OR expensive cords! |
|
| |
Sennheiser DT100's (or for ones that sound nice - DT150's). |
|
| |
This is generally the main difference between pro gear and domestic gear. It's the build quality, not the audio quality. |
|
| |
got a pair of those K141's kicking around somewhere... no problem with the cord, but the headstrap broke, so my prized headphones (okay they weren't *that* expensive <$100 iirc) look like they're made out of duct-tape. |
|
| |
Mostly when you go to buy a pair, check to see if you can take them apart to replace the cord if they break or if they're just molded plastic; the latter, forget it. |
|
| |
hmm... how about a pair that can be adjusted to any (standard) reference level ? -20 -10 +4 db's, and has various connectors |
|
| |
I wonder if the mini-xlr ones are balanced |
|
| |
[Ian] My headphones are Sennheiser HD480s too - I replaced
the foamy bits about two years ago. |
|
| |
I thought this was common in higher-end headphones. |
|
| |
I have a Sennheiser set that I got used for free, and it doesn't have a
modular cable, and the cable was damaged when I got it, so I started to
convert it to modular, but never finished. That was only a few months ago,
so I might still finish it soon. Anyway, I was planning to put the jack on top
of the headband, facing backward. That way, I can use a cable with a
straight plug or a right-angle plug and have the cable come off my head in
three directions, with clips added to the sides to hold it from flapping
around if I run it down one side or the other. |
|
| |
// I wonder if the mini-xlr ones are balanced // |
|
| |
You're probably going to plug them into an unbalanced source, so I'd doubt
it, but I haven't actually looked into it at all. |
|
| |