h a l f b a k e r yYou think: Aha! We go: ha, ha.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Britain had a national debt whilst it had an Empire, and yet the parts of the empire which were granted independence did not take with them a proportional share of the national debt. This seems like a really good deal for them, and an opportunity for us today. As debt repayments rise above 37 billion
pounds a year, it is time to look at more cost efficient methods of handling the debt.
My modest proposal is that we take just one billion of the 37 wasted billions of pounds to drive through the full independence of all parts of Great Britain other than a small flat in Wanstead, those parts leaving Great Britain being known as Greater Britain and the part remaining retaining the name Great Britain.
To permit the changeover, the national government will be established in the Wanstead flat, the nation of Greater Britain will be established, the Queen and all her assets will be transferred to the new nation and Great Britain will declare itself a republic. Now, Great Britain retains all national liabilities and debts taken on by former governments, and the Queen has transferred all titles and national assets to Greater Britain.
The national debt is now confined to the small flat in Wanstead, which will now declare itself bankrupt having no possible way to meet the repayments, and give all national assets to its creditors as the fullest possible payment.
Greater Britain may now continue without wasting stupid amounts of money on debt repayment, being entirely free of the national debt, and only slightly damaged through the loss of the flat in Wanstead. Which had dry rot and squatters anyway.
Shameless elf promotion
Clear_20UK_20national_20debt_2e
[coprocephalous, Jul 05 2010]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
if all nations seem to be in debt - who has all the money then? |
|
| |
I think it's corporations - who seem to have a whole lot of bad credit, innit? |
|
| |
Rich and powerful people, hence their disinclination to sort out all the problems. |
|
| |
[vvv] this idea is basically called 'default' and is not a new idea, and is generally a bad idea as it tends to massively piss off your creditors. |
|
| |
But a lot of the banks substantially operate from here. Why not just threaten them? |
|
| |
[pocmloc], not default, just moving almost all the debt-laden land outside the entity responsible for the debt. The basis is historical as it has been done many times in the past with the granting of independence. Neither national debt nor international obligation have been transferred to the independent nations created, yet assets, equity and sometimes even additional sums for 'reparation' and the like have been paid. |
|
| |
There's always the "What's a few quid between friends anyway? I'll buy you a beer sometime..." approach. |
|
| |
// Fine, but if you did this, the creditors would still be defaulted on, and so would think twice about lending again//
Seems to be working out OK for Man Utd and Liverpool. |
|
| |
And banks and governments. In fact the whole credit system is in danger of looking like a sort of playground swap-shop for big kids. |
|
| |
//the creditors would still be defaulted on, and so would think twice about lending again//
They are being defaulted on by Great Britain, not Greater Britain. The latter will have all the assets and a very very good debt:equity ratio. Suggesting that a newly independent state should be held responsible for the national defaulting of the nation which formerly ruled them, and which took place after independence, is frankly ridiculous. |
|
| |
//the whole credit system is in danger of looking like a sort of playground swap-shop for big kids// |
|
| |
Congratulations on stating the bleedin' obvious! |
|
| |
Has it occurred to anyone else that al least part of the problem arises from those who take vast amounts of money from the world's economies via the money markets and other scams, without producing anything throughout their entire lives? |
|
| |
(+) For making a mockery of a system which has long lost sight of it's original purpose. |
|
| |
One of the big groups of institutions that have this money, and who would suffer great losses if there was a default, is the big pension funds. i.e. you and I (well not I since I have no pension) would suffer in the future. That's what all this debt really is about; we have consumed far too much stuff, and have paid for it with promises of future productivity. Now either we start producing stuff, or we default, or we keep juggling the smoke and mirrors and hope that no-one notices. |
|
| |
//a cornerstone of the European civilisation// |
|
| |
[zen_tom], you know as well as I do that's only half the truth. As you may remember, I used to do broadly the same kind of work that you do, and we both know that this cornerstone of civilisation is also Belgian dentists dodging their taxes, American gangsters laundering their drug money, Gulf Arab princes hiding God-knows-what behind their pseudonyms and, most of all, little cliques of blokes in suits lining up "killings" which may not necessarily promote the extension of trade, wealth or social services to millions of people. |
|
| |
At first read I though this was a genius idea, then reading some of the annotations I realised that, although it strikes a chord it is simply unworkable, thanks to the savvy lenders who would ultimately know that the people running Greater Britain are those who defaulted Great Britain's debts. Bankers are not stupid. |
|
| |
This is one of those situations where we all know there's a problem, but the solution doesn't seem any more palatable. My bun goes to the fund for juggling smoke and mirrors. |
|
| |
As for the idea, it is extensively baked by individuals, and has been since ancient times. You can read about one such case in the letters of Marcus Tullius Cicero, back when he was still just a small-town lawyer with delusions of grandeur. |
|
| |
//fund for juggling smoke// I want to invest in that! Where
do I sign? |
|
| |
\\Candidate cornerstones of European Civilization\\ Shirly
colonialism deserves a separate place on the list, though
arguably it's covered under the other rubrics. |
|
| |
Zen_Tom, I am happy to accept that finance is a necessary part of trade and possibly of democracy.
What I object to is the vast swathes of the 'finance' industry which have become disassociated with the business of actually investing in business and deal in money for it's own sake. It is these organisations and individuals who leech from the economy as a whole and whose profit comes at the expense of the pension funds. |
|
| |
If the problem is debt, the solution is repayment. Why does such a self-evident and simple statement sound like lizard-men conspiracy theory nuttiness? |
|
| |
//Annex Sealand.// Redundant' to [8th_of_7]'s anno. |
|
| |
About two-thirds of UK Government debt is held in the UK (by banks, pension funds, private individuals etc). So, when 'Great Britain' defaults on it's debt, 'Greater Britain' might possibly go bankrupt as a consequence. So, it seems to me, that your Wanstead squatters will be holding 'Greater Britain's' genitals in a very uncomfortable grip indeed! |
|
| |
[DrBob], if that is the case, then I regret this whole idea has been overkill. Do you mean to say merely nationalising all banks and pension funds based in the UK could put a serious dent in the national debt? |
|
| |
Of course. If the state owns the banks that lent it the money then there is no debt. Assuming nationalisation without compensation to the shareholders, that is. |
|
| |