h a l f b a k e r yThere goes my teleportation concept.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Many email programs have "Urgent" or "Low importance" flags that you can mark your message with before sending. But often what the reader *really* wants to know is whether it's good or bad news.
If a manager has 100 emails in his/her inbox, his/her primary concern might be "what problems are occurring
today"? For that, he can jump right away to the "Bad News" flagged e-mails (those depicted with a :( face next to the subject line). Then s/he might see:
:( System Job #161A - failed to run, please call me
:( Joe, I forgot my password, what is it again,
:( Sorry, I won't be able to make lunch next Tuesday, let's reschedule for next week
Etc. Then the manager can instantly identify the day's problems.
Often, just the combination of smiley plus subject line will make the email's contents obvious. This saves the manager's time opening & reading every email the instant s/he receives it. For example,
:) Reconciliation of assets to liabilities you know the email will say that blah blah blah the employee checked the reports and they matched.
:) My exam
Now you know your friend passed his exam, instantly, before even opening the message. Conversely, :( my exam you can prepare yourself for the worst before being hit with it.
Not every email needs a :) / :( flag; it's optional to use one. Just as the "urgent" flag is optional.
Thank you.
Another email summary idea
AutoSummarizeReply [theircompetitor, Jul 07 2005]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
|
I think the wider point that emails
should have a wide range of semantic
flags which the sender can set is a good
one. Once you know an email is
non-urgent, bad news, requiring a
response, without resource
implications, not a circular, and short
enough to read in under 30s then you'll
know whether to open it or not. |
|
|
:( Security will be along to escort you out of your office. Please leave your badge at the front desk. |
|
|
Would there be a good news / bad news flag? Could you specify which you would like to read first? :): |
|
|
I like this alot... ...not sure if that is good news or bad news. |
|
|
:) london 2012 / :( london 2005 |
|
|
Yes but since that decision is made on the other end of the line people would just start flaging urgent all the time. |
|
|
:) You didn't get the promotion. |
|
| |