h a l f b a k e r yYou could have thought of that.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you could buy a second TV. |
|
|
You could buy a second TV, but if you had this system, it would probably also allow playing single player games in 3D. Of course if a games was more fun in 3D, when you wanted to play it multiplayer, you'd be back with the same problem as before. You might be able to try displaying two 3D pictures at once but I suspect it would look bad with each image only showing up 1/4 of the time. |
|
|
Good idea.
On a PC monitor, the update frequency would probably be fast enough to show 2 x 2D images. Perhaps non-interlaced images would be better.
I wonder if the update frequency is fast enough for 2 x 3D images (I think some can update at about 100Hz).
Synchronisation could be by placing a small sensor on a corner of the screen, or connnection to a PC port.
I wonder if sound could be used to synchronise (no wires)?
A third party could also wear goggles which might be switchable between payer 1 and player 2.
Two TVs or monitors would require two video outputs.
|
|
|
Obviously you could buy a second TV, but how many homes do you know where there is room for a second large 32" or better TV? The idea here is to not have to drop another $1000 or more on a large hi-def TV, not to mention building a new second entertainment stand to house it. |
|
| |