h a l f b a k e r yApply directly to forehead.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Today, driving in driving rain, I found my tyres losing traction
as I drove up a mountain.
A fifth wheel, central to the vehicle and toothed to engage a
gear rack set into the road surface, would allow much better
traction up such daunting slopes, safely.
When retracted it could double
as a regenerative energy
storage device, seeing as how it would be a large, heavy
flywheel most of the time.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
|
A true furnicular uses two cars linked by a
cable, which balance one another. |
|
|
This is actually a rack-and-pinion system. |
|
|
The wheel wouldn't need to be heavy per se;
there just needs to be enough downforce
from the mass of the vehicle to keep it
engaged. |
|
|
There would need to be a way of keeping the
vehicle exactly central on the rack. On cog
raiways, that's not a problem as the rack is
simply centred between the rails. |
|
|
Could be done on a 4x4 with a gearbox rear
power takeoff port i.e. a Land Rover. |
|
|
A narrow-gauge-to-cog railway once ran within a few dozen
yards of my house (pre-existing appeal); |
|
|
and I generally love things that involve maximizing traction
while going up mountains and such; |
|
|
and I love regenerative motors and flywheels and large
heavy mechanical devices; |
|
|
and it seems like the sort of thing that would make a
unique and interesting noise... |
|
|
It could be lighter, [8th], but that would detract from
the steampunk overkill factor I intended. |
|
|
There was a Panhard armored car that had four rubber-
tired road wheels and four more cleated steel wheels that
dropped down between them for enhanced traction. I've
seen one somewhere. Bovington, maybe? |
|
| |