h a l f b a k e r yNot just a think tank. An entire army of think.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
For F1? Yes, why not? I don't fancy having a rapidly-spinning
fuel-tank in my own car, though. |
|
| |
Actually, the driver is probably the heaviest single
component of an F1 car - how about using him as the
flywheel? To be realistic, he'd have to rotate axially, and
would probably need to drive in a prone position. The
steering wheel, indicators, windscreen washers, ashtray,
satnav etc
would all have to rotate in synch, so perhaps what's needed
is a sort of cylindrical cockpit with rotable couplings to the
rest of the car. |
|
| |
After ruling out the driver, the engine, and then the gearbox I opted for the fuel. |
|
| |
The gearbox was 2nd choice to the fuel! The diff would have been fixed in place along with the gearcage and eingine. |
|
| |
Kinetic Energy Release System? |
|
| |
And the positive aspect of a flywheel system* could be that it stops the car from spinning. |
|
| |
And the negative aspect of a flywheel system* could be that it stop the car from turning. |
|
| |
I'm not convinced that there is enough mass. How many gallons of fuel does an F1 car carry when full? |
|
| |
Maybe more to the point: How many gallons of fuel does an F1 car carry when empty? |
|
| |