h a l f b a k e r yThe phrase 'crumpled heap' comes to mind.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
I believe that it should be possible to create a floating
research base with a large optical telescope mounted on it.
Similar to floating oceanic research bases, it should be
able to stay out at sea for months or years, though of
course the scientists and crew would of course be on
rotations
of only a few months.
The main benefit of this idea is that there is no light
pollution in the ocean.
The downside of course is that we would need a really
awesome stabilization system to adjust for movement from
waves, but I believe that this may be feasible.
[link]
|
| |
For one thing, there are still plenty of places on land that don't suffer from light pollution, and where it's a lot easier to build and operate a large, stable telescope. |
|
| |
For another thing, the best telescopes are located at high altitude, to reduce atmospheric distortion and haze. A floating telescope would (unless I've missed something) tend to be at sea level. |
|
| |
The idea could allow the widening of the otherway, that is, a network array of thousands of telescopes all across the globe's surface. |
|
| |
//the best telescopes are located at high altitude, |
|
| |
So, use a high part of the ocean. Generate a standing wave if the bit of the ocean you had your eye on turns out to be significantly beneath sea level. |
|
| |
But seriously, it's possible to do high-elevation observatories and water. Antarctica has the 16,050 ft Mount Vinson, which is covered in ice. A bit parky, but no light pollution bar the headlights on adventurous penguins. |
|
| |