h a l f b a k e r yI think, therefore I am thinking.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
How about arrows with RFID tags designed to take
power from a hand-held radio beam, and chirp (either
audibly or in RF or maybe even both)? |
|
|
I agree - radio-trackable arrows would make a lot
more sense. |
|
|
However, a [+] for combining two beautiful and
under-used words in the title. |
|
|
While I agree that radio tracking would be more effective, that seems somewhat counter to the old-technology charm of bow hunting. Then again, a lot of the bows used for hunting aren't really old-technology either. |
|
|
I dunno, [scad]. I reckon electromagnetic waves
were around before coloured smoke. |
|
|
The easiest solution would be to make the arrowhead from depleted uranium. Not only would this poison the wound but you could potentially triangulate with a geiger counter. |
|
|
a small flashing IR led might be useful here. |
|
|
Radio-trackable arrows are baked. As far as I know there
aren't any off-the-shelf models available, but bowhunting
catalogs sell DIY kits with RFID inserts that go inside the
shaft. You can also get nocks with flashing LED beacons
that activate on release. |
|
|
I like this idea better. [+] |
|
|
// You can also get nocks with flashing LED beacons
that activate on release// But IR leds would be
visible on a cheap and nasty camera, and the deer
would be oblivious, unless deer can see IR? I have no
eye deer. |
|
|
Deer can't see IR. Their visible spectrum is surprisingly
limited, but it's a trade-off for great night vision, incredible
motion sensitivity, and a 280-degree field of view. |
|
| |