h a l f b a k e r y"More like a cross between an onion, a golf ball, and a roman multi-tiered arched aquaduct."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Airlines are concerned with improving in-flight experience. In an attempt to further this end airlines should construct vast arrays of WWII-like anti-aircraft flak batteries. Rather than taking down their own planes these altitude sensitive canisters will be filled with confetti!!! Instantly fliers will
be in a world of fun and excitement! Brilliant shiny colors will surround them. I would suggest some music as well. Maybe some sort of aisle parade. Flakfetti.
cannon launched confetti
Explosive_20Paintball_20Flak_20Cannon
Nope, I'm wrong. Not really similar at all, but combinations of these two ideas would be cool. [Custardguts, Feb 05 2007]
[link]
|
| |
I'm sure I saw this here before... |
|
| |
Thought so you sneaky bugger. I thought I was going insane there for a minute. Have you seen the idea in the link? Imagine drawing great big mountain ranges in the sky ahead or beside the plane for the passengers' amusement/terror? |
|
| |
I reposted this idea from an old account, the old one isn't there anymore. |
|
| |
No I haven't but I like your idea which takes it the needed next step forward. |
|
| |
Aside from the name (which sounds to me like it could lead to some type of dandruff related celebration), this seems like fun. It'd put a little positive excitement into airline travel. |
|
| |
the confetti canister would probably be solid enough to shoot down an aircraft if it hit one dead on before the confetti released |
|
| |
and the confetti could get sucked into a jet intake |
|
| |
What? Great expense for needless, and likely to be ignored, entertainment- sounds like a capitalistic idea to me! Especially when one considers the potential environmental ramifications of this idea, compounded by the fact that it is based on pure vanity. (+) Take that nature! |
|
| |
//the confetti could get sucked into a jet intake// |
|
| |
Yeah, it could, but it probably wouldn't hurt anything, provided it's made of paper. Aluminumized plastic should be okay, too. |
|
| |
(Jet engines are sometimes cleaned by chucking in a handful of ground-up walnut shells. And they are tested by throwing in a dead chicken.) |
|
| |
21, its biodegradable, made out of ultra-compressed cow dung. |
|
| |
while i like this idea [+]. i have to disagree
with you on one point. |
|
| |
/Airlines are concerned with improving in-
flight experience/ |
|
| |
what airlines do you fly???? |
|
| |
JetFetti, how could I forget? |
|
| |
This is way better than sucking birds into the engine! |
|
| |
Not to be confused with Fettish Airways which has other methods of improving the in-flight experience. |
|
| |
Can we have a few vintage Junkers to harry the plane? |
|
| |