h a l f b a k e r yFewer ducks than estimates indicate.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
This is surely baked by a family of geeks in or around Silicon Valley. |
|
|
What I think is more appropriate for home use is multiple PCs with a shared storage unit, printer(s) and Internet connection. But that is easily Bakeable. |
|
|
Exactamundo. A "Family PC" would be a work-around, not a solution. |
|
|
hmm, 4 hard drives in one machine... Somewhat more pricy and might need more cooling inside the PC. And a virus could possibly whipe out all the hard drives at once... |
|
|
just a nagging point for me....can
we say computer instead of PC?
that *word* just pisses me off
somehow... |
|
|
Your idea is flawed. Most people in this world run all of their Windows XP user accounts as part of the Admin group. If you were to change every day-to-day account to be a member of the Users group, this entire problem would be pretty much solved. |
|
|
When your account is part of the Users group, you are only allowed to make changes in your home directory, nothing system-wide or that would affect another user. If you need to install an application or some other system-wide change, you simple select "Run As" from the context menu and type the Admin password. |
|
|
First of all, you could use partitions. Second, if a computer gets "hached," or a virus gets on it, the "hacher" or virus can access all the drives. |
|
|
It's called unix. Just use a mainframe with a few graphical terminals. |
|
|
Yeah, not really a new idea, and it works a whole lot better if you just do it virtually with user accounts. if you really want to talk about *physically* separating the users, it's called a mainframe/workstation system, except a little backwards in a weird way. big deal. people have been using those for probably two decades. |
|
| |