h a l f b a k e r yContrary to popular belief
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This elevator does not start out agreeable, but as travellers experience the relativity of time and space their evaluations change from okay to good to great.
Whether ascension, or descension, the meaning of escalator doesn't change direction even if it does. A shaky, crooked old man stands at
either end of the conveyor of meaning waving tiny fists saying "you're crazy to ride it" to each passerby.
Halfbakery: Infinite Staircase
Infinite Staircase
Aha - there you go - from memory, the escalator started out agreeable, but got considerably worse. [zen_tom, Dec 13 2012]
The Mezzanine by Nicholson Baker
http://en.wikipedia.../wiki/The_Mezzanine
[sqeaketh the wheel, Dec 13 2012]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
I remember reading a story about someone who
found themselves on a series of escalators which
turned out to be infinitely long - it turned out to be
quite bleak reading, if interesting - I just can't
remember who wrote it, or what it was called. |
|
| |
You're nonlucid of the nonlucidivist. |
|
| |
One of my favorite novels: The Mezzanine by Nicholson Baker. [link] The whole story takes place during one ride up the escalator. All hell breaks out in his mind, worthy of Douglas Adams. |
|
| |
By the way, a bun in the "special rcarty category." [+] |
|
| |
//Does the escalator require non-lucidean geometry?
— MaxwellBuchanan, Dec 13 2012// |
|
| |
I had a good laugh at that one. |
|
| |
Me too, and I think nonlucidean geometry should exist sort of like pataphysics. There's no sense forcing a mind to conform to some powerful system, when new things can be imagined especially when that mind demonstrates resistance. I never liked the discipline required for maths, and do not remember anyone fondly who disciplined me. |
|
| |
//a bun in the "special rcarty category." //
That sounds painful! |
|
| |
Personally I find math to be rather freeing, like learning to walk. The discipline required is nothing but conforming to and dealing with the laws of gravity while you wander about and explore the park. |
|
| |
I hurt myself once and had to work with numbers doing bookkeeping and tax prep while taking physio. For the entire time that I was crunching numbers I didn't have a single idea pop into my head, not even so much as a tickle of an inkling.
I don't know for certain that the two are linked, but for me it seemed that I had to suppress that creative aspect of my mind in order to focus on the strictly rational numbers. |
|
| |
I kind of wish that learning the language of math didn't come with that price-tag. |
|
| |
My math is okay, but that's not the point. Precise logic is necessary for some things, but not for understanding a world where people dont have precise logic. More to the point is people should be free to exercise their will, and not be subject to various coercions. Any system for bending or manipulating the will can be abused no matter how righteous the ends are appraised to be. Example: just because one person feels sexually liberated when they have sex with another person, does not mean another person's will should be bent to achieving those ends. |
|
| |
Richard Feynman. Creative guy. Played bongos. Pretty good at math, too. |
|
| |
Most of the time I'm not sure what your point is. |
|
| |
I have a methodology to my method. |
|
| |
//Richard Feynman. Creative guy. Played bongos. Pretty good at math, too// |
|
| |
I am not saying that math-minded people are not creative, or that Feynman isn't a better man than I, just that all peoples' minds seem to lie somewhere on a scale for any given talent.
I'm also not saying that I couldn't learn math without squashing my creativity, there were certain areas of math I did very well in but for the most part equations baffle me and focussing on them causes me to lose focus in other areas. |
|
| |
Ah to be ambifocusterous... |
|
| |
That's usually what people say math or creativity, but that's really not very clear. They are not really equivalent things to compare. Numeracy and literacy maybe. But that's not the point either, really it comes down to what you want to do. It's not a compromise it's your own personal choice. It's someone else's evaluation of math that is imposed on you, whether you need it one day or not. I never learned how to tie many different types of knots, and as a result I only know how to tie maybe half a dozen even though I have needed more than that from time to time, but I don't particularly like learning how to tie knots, so I don't. No biggie, doesn't mean someone else who knows more knots is a better person. Remember that I don't want to do it? Some people have no respect for another person's god given will. |
|
| |
// do not remember anyone fondly who disciplined me // |
|
| |
Huh. Each to their own I guess. *dreamy sigh* |
|
| |