h a l f b a k e r yNot just a think tank. An entire army of think.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
You'll need a pump to keep the chamber evacuated, so you might
as well use the motor from that to top up the fly wheel. |
|
|
But, surely, this is a calendar, not a clock? |
|
|
You could add some extra goodies to make it a calendar, but currently it's a 24hr clock (okay the backplate actually measures 24h3m56s, but the hand or the backplate is skipped at 00:00, 3m56s worth) |
|
|
Note the outer gimbal needs to have 14'ish degrees of free movement with regards the mounting to allow for Earth's declination. |
|
|
I'm sortof envisioning the "winding" mechanism to be magnetic: wound through the enclosure without being mechanically connected to the flywheel; a vacuum pump wouldn't be part of normal maintenance. |
|
|
[Dub] thanks for sp. correction (1/365.2419 not 1/365.25, anno accidentally deleted), but I'll stick with 365.25 in case I want to use a gear mechanism of 1467 teeth for the skip; the difference is less than 2sec per year. |
|
|
(apologies to [Jutta] for overflowing the dailies buffer by re-editing this anno a few hundred times) § x1 |
|
|
When this idea had its original title did it have that tagline [FlyingToaster]? |
|
|
can't remember what the original title was... "precessional clock" ? changed it a couple minutes after I posted it then I waited for hoouuurs for somebody to get the joke, before adding the summary punchline. Also added a line explaining how it works so it didn't look like a calendar. |
|
|
Ha! And I got it about five seconds before I opened the idea this time. Thank you. |
|
|
The first title was, Narcissistic clock, and I'm ashamed to admit that I didn't get it until seconds before I just asked. |
|
|
[UB] Still wrapping my head around declination, etc. might be able to fit in a precession-correction and a calendar using a cam instead of gears. |
|
|
I wonder why this isn't baked: scientists knew about orbits and (I assume) gyroscopes: 4 minutes a day isn't too bad and it's a consistent daily offset. [edit] never mind: due to friction they would have had to wind it up every 10 minutes in the mid-1800's. |
|
|
If this clock was truely egocentric then the flywheel
would stay staunch and indignantly stationary and its
casing/gimbals would revolve and precess. |
|
|
well, the casing is the egocentric part |
|
|
//You could fashion it in your own image. That might clear up some of the confusion.// |
|
|
Egotistical eccentric escapement by an escaped eccentric egotist ? |
|
| |