h a l f b a k e r yWarm and Fussy
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
A game in which 2 or more players are in a body of water competing who can stay afloat the longest. The water would be deep and preferably ruff seas, Each player would have weights on their feets and a dive team would be on the side, the last man to go under wins. The divers would rescue the people who
drown. All contact is allowed except for removing the weights
[link]
|
| |
// The divers would rescue the people who drown. // |
|
| |
It would be a bit late by that stage, I'm afraid. |
|
| |
My definition of drowning is different as well. It implies that no underwater CPR is possible. |
|
| |
[Joe], you seem to have a lot of lousy ideas. What do you think that is owing to? |
|
| |
Its the next challenge on "Survivor" |
|
| |
Survive Joe's ideas... Who will be the last person reading? |
|
| |
RayfordSteele: I certainly wouldn't win *that* game ! ;-) |
|
| |
How about a 'Sky-Diving' game? Basics: 2 players, 1 parachute. For an interesting twist: add 1 gun, suitcase full of cash, or an an extra parachute with a hole it in. |
|
| |
I think it's more interesting if there are two guns, but they have to be flintlocks. |
|
| |
This game would be biased in favour of witches - who as we all know, float. |
|
| |
And what do we do when we find more witches? Burn 'em! |
|
| |
//What do you think that is owing to?// |
|
| |
Elitism? Pedantry? Exclusionist attitudes? |
|
| |
Now, I don't agree with this idea particularly, but I've seen a couple of Joe's ideas, (the Eggshell Serial Number, and the Carpooling Website), which probably would have been received with warmer welcomes, were it not for substandard grammar. |
|
| |
Ducks float too.PS.Welcome knights of ni. |
|
| |
ruff = rough = spell check! |
|
| |