h a l f b a k e r yi v n i n seeks n e t o
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
This is used to be baked on the Macintosh, where each file held the info of what program it belonged to. I think it was called the "Bundle bits," but maybe it was something in the resource fork. |
|
|
It would be nice to see this in Windows. |
|
|
What if I don't want to open it with the program you specify? What if I don't even have the program you specify? What if I'm not even using the same operating system? |
|
|
[Detly] - Implement it like the <font> tag in html. List the recommended applications in descending order. If you don't have one of them then let the OS try to figure it out as usual - it shouldn't matter which OS. [+] |
|
|
Have one nearly computer illiterate croissant. |
|
|
To answer Deltly's question, this would only suggest a program and not make it mandatory. Just like if your opening a file and your deflate is to open it in pain. You can right click and change that. This would be the same |
|
|
On the Macintosh, every file had a 4-byte 'application signature' and a 4-byte 'file type'. The application signature would determine which application should be used if a file was double-clicked; the file type would be used to let programs select what types of files they could open. The Think Pascal compiler would save source-code files with a signature of PJMM and a type of TEXT. They could thus be opened with anything that could handle text files, but double-clicking them would launch Think Pascal. |
|
|
I miss the Macintosh. So much better than Windows with its goofy file-name extensions. |
|
|
BTW, how did MIcrosoft get the audacity to call MS Word documents ".doc" files when the extension had been used for years to describe text files? |
|
|
[gelie] - Any file which opens deflating me with pain is not welcome on my machine. I hope my anti-virus gets it before I do. |
|
|
WordPerfect files were also ".doc" files well before Word became a big player. |
|
|
I thought WordPerfect used a .WP file extension. |
|
|
Still baked on Macintosh, [robinism].
You can set the opening application of
any document in its 'info' window. And
Macintosh documents still have four-
letter signatures and file-types
[supercat]. |
|
|
I think Frame Maker, DisplayWrite, SmartWare and Wordstar also use(d) .doc as well as the ASCII text use. |
|
|
I know that WordPerfect files can sometimes be .doc, too. Maybe that's when they're saved as Word compatible? (a guess). |
|
|
If you can set on your own machine what program to use to open specific file types, why would you need anything more? |
|
|
<grabs AST Premium Exec 386/SX/25 (Color - ooh) laptop from the artifact room. fires up Word Perfect for Windows 6.0a (1990 - 1992)> |
|
|
Word Perfect 6.0 (*.wpd, *.wpt, *.doc, *.wp)
Word Perfect 4.x, 5.x (*.doc, *.wp)
Office Writer 6 (*.wp) |
|
|
Other *.doc:
Professional Write
Multimate 3.x
Multimate Advantage II
Display Write
|
|
|
Before Windows, many word-processing programs used a .doc extension when saving documents as text files. |
|
|
// If you can set on your own machine what program to use to open specific file types, why would you need anything more? // |
|
|
To cater for those who are more "technically inept" than others... |
|
|
You mean DOS 6, I perzoom [Shz]. |
|
|
Word Perfect 6 for Windows x might be a better way to say it. |
|
|
Wow [supercat] - youre old. <snicker> Back then I was using EVE on a VAX 11/780. |
|
|
My Adobe actually spells out "Microsoft Word Document (*.doc)" and no other option. Even M$ products give you more format choices for filetypes with the .doc extension. |
|
| |