h a l f b a k e r yRecalculations place it at 0.4999.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This is a deer friendly deterrent system, the purpose is
to
keep them off your property and prevent them from
eating
your shrubs.
This is how it works you hire my company to send a
gentle
person that essentially hangs out, outside your home and
when he sees a deer he attempts to ride
it off your
property.
The Deer Rider would set up a camera to document his
various attempts to ride a deer. Deer Rider incorporated
would own the rights to the video footage. In the event
that the deer rider was able to successfully ride a deer
the
customer would not have to pay for that days deer riding
services.
This would be more of a deer chasing service and this is
good because it will teach deer to fear humans and
humans to fear riding deer.
Deer Whispering techniques would be strictly prohibited.
Deer chasing works both ways.
http://2.bp.blogspo...203-deer+attack.jpg
[swimswim, Jan 23 2013]
Your argument is invalid...
http://wtfcontent.c...mg/134989429364.jpg
[2 fries shy of a happy meal, Jan 23 2013]
badger
http://theshroom.wo...ask-a-honey-badger/
[vfrackis, Jan 24 2013]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
The deer would REALLY fear humans if I ever got a ride on one. If it survived. |
|
| |
A bun, not so much for the idea itself (which would
actually be illegal in my state; "terrorizing game and
wildlife" is a ridiculously puny misdemeanor crime), but for
what I thought it
might be, and for the fresh round of jokes it will inevitably
spawn. |
|
| |
Oh deer, I was going to deride this idea then realized that
would make me a derider thus substantiating the concept.
Well played [vfrackis]. Well played. [+] |
|
| |
Devil take the hind, most. |
|
| |
Deer Rider Inc could branch out and provide similar
deterrent services for all manner of activities one
wished to discourage, the common thread being the
efforts of the Deer Rider, and the video. |
|
| |
Bungston what exactly did you have in mind? |
|
| |
Oh, riding squirrels; gerbils; guinea pigs... |
|
| |
(Deer already injure more people than ALL other
wild animals, combined. They are dangerous
animals, not at all cuddly and friendly.) |
|
| |
"Thank you for calling the Fish and Game
Department, my name is Bob. How can I help you?" |
|
| |
--"Thank goodness. I hope you can help me. The
police and the highway department were just
horrible." |
|
| |
"Oookay, I'll try to help, what seems to be the
problem?" |
|
| |
--"It's the signs, you must take them down at
once!" |
|
| |
"Uh- signs? What signs would those be?" |
|
| |
--"The deer crossing signs. You must take them
down!" |
|
| |
"Why do you want the signs taken down?" |
|
| |
--"It isn't safe! They keep getting hit by cars! They
mustn't cross there!" |
|
| |
Will they also deal with unwanted badgers? |
|
| |
No such thing as an unwanted badger? |
|
| |
Yes yes, but do they do effleurage? |
|
| |
This sounds like it would cost a lot of doe. Quite a few bucks. |
|
| |
It's like the only surefire way to get the cat to bugger off: walk towards it going "ooh, nice kitty, come here kitty" with outstretched arms. |
|
| |
I... I don't really know how to vote this one. Would the deer riding technician wear some protective clothing? Would they be fired if they didn't try to actually ride the deers and instead shooed them away? Would they be covered by insurance? Would they be allowed to wear bear costumes for efficiency? What if the deer tramples all the shrubs when fleeing from the scene? Who pays for that? What if the deer runs in front of a car while running away from the rider? Who pays for that? |
|
| |
The Deer Rider Services Group is not in control of
any deer and makes no statement that it either
seeks to control or is capable of controlling any
such creature. |
|
| |
The Deer Rider Services Group would be exempt
from any liability associated with any damages
caused by a deer/acts of god. |
|
| |
I believe that Deer are responsible for their own
behavior. Overreacting to stimuli in their
immediate environment and then trampling bushes
is an irresponsible deer behavior as is leaping in
front of a moving vehicle. |
|
| |
[+] I like it and would like to apply for a position at your company! |
|
| |
What?!! Not liable for damages resulting from acts of god?!? The nerve! I hope they revoke your license, you... you... you're a very irresponsible person! |
|
| |
You know this only works if the rider is a midget in racing jockey uniform and colours. |
|
| |
This idea makes me horny. Okay, maybe not... |
|
| |
What [FlyingToaster] said. But that goes for just about any Halfbakery
idea. |
|
| |
So these deer riders would be indistinguishable from perverts. Your going to be giving them video camera equipment to record their deer riding while requiring them to //gentle person that essentially hangs out, outside your home // |
|
| |
Nothing about an insurance policy addendum for
peoples living in rural regions with dense deer
populations, then? |
|
| |