h a l f b a k e r yIt's not a thing. It will be a thing.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
perhaps there should be a half-bakery shop crammed to the rafters with these daft products for the extremely lazy e.g. the prefolded toilet paper ; a croissant for whoever suggested the pre-impregnated ova. suggestions for a shop name - sloth-r-us! |
|
|
Yeah really. What next, blend the ketchup and mustard together in those little packets? hmmm. |
|
|
A butter and sugar mix for toast: bugar |
|
|
teeth now seriously set on edge, thanks bris for the thought of sugar in butter - rrrggghhh |
|
|
[po] I think the term 'efficient' (will learn to spell one day) would be more polite. We could argue it out, but I can't be bothered...... |
|
|
rbl, which word would you like me to replace with: effecient [sic]. I am sure it can be arranged!!!! |
|
|
Sloth is the father of invention. |
|
|
Continue with the 'efficiency'. Just bundle all things you intake to your body to one glob and get it over with. Mmmm, yummie. |
|
|
Make that a once-per-year dose, dag, and you get my vote. |
|
|
Ketchup + Mustard = Mustketchup? |
|
|
not if you keep it in use other ways. Anyway, if we were going to take away the food consumption and waste expulsion functions of our major anatomical orifices surely we could just do it all some other way, like using a drip. And that idea is very quasi/half-baked. |
|
|
The biggest problem with the now lost original idea is that not everybody likes the same amount of cream or sugar, and this would make stores add another expense, having to buy several different types of the stuff for the few people whose tastes matched the proportion it was mixed in. |
|
| |