h a l f b a k e r yRomantic, but doomed to fail.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I award a gold pastry which remains theoretical because I oppose any 'sport' where the winner is necessarily determined by a judge. Having said which, I like to watch ice-skating, and suspect that Crop-Circling could be organized in a similar way, with compulsory figures and so on. |
|
|
I'd just knock the whole field over and tell the judges my design was bigger than the area I had to work with. |
|
|
[bliss]: I meant that the competitors would have to make a number of standard designs which would be judged for their precision, as well as the 'free programme' where they can be totally imaginative. |
|
|
I believe there are rivalries between circle maker groups, who try to outdo each other. |
|
|
[phoenix]: methinks you are somewhat missing the olympic ethic. The rules would clearly state that the designs would have to be contained within the field perimeter (say 100m X 100m). |
|
|
[bliss]: I wasn't thinking these would be MY Olympics - I'd like to see crop circling included in THE Olympics, so I'm sure the US would be there. Come to think of it the US could be at the Commonwealth Games if we'd hadn't had that little spot of bother over you'all paying taxes a few years ago... |
|
|
Given that crop circles are either works of art, hoaxes, or alien artifacts, depending on your point of view, I don't quite see how they qualfy as a sport, which is surely a pre-requisite for the Olympics. I mean, we have yet to see 10k oil painting. |
|
|
[angel: many fine sports require judges and/or referees. Are you going to argue that boxing and wrestling are not sports?] |
|
|
If a team plays lawn tennis at midnight in the field, maybe the judges would like the sporty look. |
|
|
Twosheds: Wasn't that another George, King George III, "a few years ago" who said, "Read my lips, no new taxes"? |
|
|
[Farmer]: In terms of history (well at least recorded British history), 250 years isn't that long... |
|
|
[DrCurry]: And synchronised swimming is? You need to look more broadband here, think galactically. |
|
|
[DrCurry]: The judges in wrestling (I'm talking about real wrestling, not the choreographed pantomime seen on TV) are simply to ensure that the rules are followed. (The adjudicators in Cornish wrestling are referred to as 'sticklers'.) I oppose points decisions in boxing. In ice-skating, high-diving, and many more, the winner is determined purely on the basis of the judges' opinions. I consider that, in a true sport, it must be possible to specify how one may win; in soccer, by scoring more goals than the opposition; in cricket, by hitting more runs; in athletics, by running more quickly, or throwing something further, than anyone else; cf in gymnastics, by performing some series of actions which the judges will (by some unspecified criteria) like. |
|
| |