h a l f b a k e r yClearly this is a metaphor for something.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
This device consists of 1: a fart catcher, a bottle into which
one farts. 2: a fart compressor, an air pump that connects
to
the fart catcher and pumps the methane into 3: A fart tank.
This fart tank, when full, can be connected to one's gas line
for free fuel.
edit: title because some
humorless
bastard would have complained about "Efficient usage of
cooking: gas"
Taken from my post?
Efficient_20usage_20of_20cooking_20gas
On my second post I joked about doing this. [metarinka, Dec 24 2010]
[link]
|
| |
I worry about energy density. I think you might be better off eating a healthy, fiber rich diet then drying and burning your dung. |
|
| |
!! "..drying and burning your ... "!!! Oh, "d*u*ng". Okay, then. |
|
| |
humans don't produce enough methane to do this. It would take the whole village just to warm up one can of beans. |
|
| |
They also sort of do this with cow's already save for the fact that they use it to generate electricity. the equipment to refine the gas costs over a million though, so it's only economical for large farms with grants. |
|
| |
[+] I am a strong supporter of fart-fuels. |
|
| |
// It would take the whole village just to warm up one can of beans. // |
|
| |
Recursion: See under "Recursion".... |
|
| |
Farts are mainly carbon dioxide and nitrogen. I think it could be done by way of fractional distillation. Hydrogen sulphide, which is supposedly not present in all farts, has an unusually high boiling point and could be separated quite easily but is also quite toxic. It can't be that concentrated in farts even when it's present because of that toxicity. Methane would be a better bet because its toxicity is low. The mixture would then be nitrogen and methane. |
|
| |
You'd be better off with poo. |
|
| |
What is the ratio of the potential energy of the flammable gasses in a fart, to the kinetic energy of the fart as it rushes forth from arse to world? Would it not be better to install an anal turbine? |
|
| |
//They also sort of do this with cow's already // |
|
| |
That's rediculous. Do you have ANY idea how many farts it
would take to warm up a cow?? |
|
| |
In India they're going the digester route. They don't
see the sense in pumping to poison our bio-
products. Very small scale units digest to methane,
to cook with. For the Mother of all Smelly Farts
make baked beans up as normal but add bacon in
uncooked instead of cooked. |
|
| |
metarinka, the equipment needed to separate out
the methane from the gas produced by
biodigesting the poo of few thousand cows might
cost over a million dollars, but: |
|
| |
For cooking, heating, and on-site energy
production, the gas from a biodigester doesn't
need to be purified into methane -- it can be used
as is. It only needs to be purified if one wants to
sell it to the local utility company. |
|
| |
Furthermore, biogas digesters can be made small
scale. |
|
| |