h a l f b a k e r yNormal isn't your first language, is it?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Do we put conspiracy theory ideas in the associated category,
or should we have a category just for conspiracies? And why
am I asking this? Who put that idea in my head?
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
[giggling behind the sofa]
Sssh! I don't think he's seen us yet! |
|
|
well, it's only a theory... |
|
|
We don't have this category, because a conspiracy theory isn't really considered a halfbaked invention. It's probably quite easy to generate any number of non-plausable, ego-centric theories implicating various external parties as running things behind the scenes for their own ends. Some of those might be entertaining, but I wont hold my breath. |
|
|
There's no need for the category .... move along,
nothing to see here folks ..... just move along ....
what branch of the Police ? Yes, the Thought Police,
yes, M'am. Nothing to see here ... keep moving ... |
|
|
There's no substantive evidence of any sort of a conspiracy, or the presence of a mole - which is, of course, just what you'd expect. Highly suspicious .... |
|
|
//a conspiracy theory isn't really considered a halfbaked invention// Several ideas here have 'conspiracy theory' as their central theme, without simply being an example of a conspiracy theory. You could equally well argue that "a car isn't really considered a halfbaked invention". |
|
|
Today's halfbaked conspiracy theory is tomorrows working
supposition. |
|
|
Theoretically a halfbaked conspiracy is the same as a full
blown one. |
|
|
Every conspiracy is halfbaked, at least in theory. |
|
|
Conspiring to halfbake a theory should be categorically
denied. |
|
|
Why was this idea supressed and hidden for over nine years? |
|
| |