h a l f b a k e r yRight twice a day.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Television is supported by advertisements. If ads did not pay most of the cost of broadcasting, TV would cost a fortune. <Cable and satellite does not provide programming, it provides ACCESS to programming.> |
|
|
Might be cool to have 'shareware' TV, pay for commercial free programs one at a time or something, especially if you wanted to record a movie... |
|
|
Actually TV wouldn't cost a fortune. The licence fee in the UK, which supports the BBC, costs about 90 quid a year (I think). A bargain. |
|
|
It's 104 pounds now - still a bargain. The three commercial
channels generally put out unwatchable and/or plagiarized
CRAP ...
Channel 4 used to be good, until it decided to dedicate 90%
of its output to advertising its digital/satellite spin-off stations
which are both crud, and the other 10% to ripping off BBC2
ideas wholesale.
Adverts are c00l however, and should go into the TV guide
so that we know when our favourites are going to be aired.
Especially the ones for the Renault Clio. |
|
|
The reason that commercials coincide (at least on American TV) is that the programming across networks is similar at most times of the day (soaps and talk shows during the day, half-hour sitcoms at 8, hour-long dramas at 10). These shows tend to have logical breaks between "acts." |
|
|
As for putting them in TV guides, the problem is that commercials vary to a much greater degree than programming, as it varies by signal provider rather than content producer. |
|
|
Right. The networks sell feeds to the local affiliates, who put their own local commercials in over the national ones. You can often see inept editing, where you get a second of one commercial before it switches to another. |
|
| |