h a l f b a k e r yThese statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I love mechanical watches and clocks. I collect the former, and
accumulate the latter.
One problem with basic spring-powered, pendulum-regulated
clocks
is that they are not isochronous: they run faster when the spring is
newly-wound-up than when it's almost run down. This is because
the
escape wheel (which is driven, indirectly, by the spring) gives the
pendulum a tiny nudge via the escapement, at each swing, to keep
it
going. This tiny nudge is enough to make the pendulum swing a
little faster than its "natural" rate. The nudge is stronger when
the
clock is first wound, and weaker as it runs down, so the clock runs
faster and then slower by a very small amount. As an example, I
have an old station clock with an 8-day movement which gains
about
5 min in the three days after its wound, and then loses about 8min
over the next 4 days. Most of the gain is in the first day, and I've
set the subsequent loss to offset this, so the clock is never more
than 5min out.
Now, this 8-day movement will run the clock for 8 days or more
(hence its name), but the clock will run most accurately if it is
wound up less than fully at the start of the week, and then run for
only 7 days before winding again. In this way, you avoid the "very
fast" bit when the clock
has been wound up as far as possible, and also the "very slow" bit
on
the 8th day when it is almost unwound.
The problem is, though, that it's very difficult to wind the clock up
just enough to keep it going for 7 days. The only way you can tell
when it's wound is when the spring "goes tight" (ie, the coils start
to
touch eachother), and by this point you've given it the full 8 days
of
winding, and it will run very fast for the first day.
You could, of course, count the number of turns of the winding
key,
and find that a full winding was 16 turns of the key, so 14 turns
would be ideal. However, if you're slightly out (eg, if it unwinds
only
13.5 turns in a week), then you'll 'accumulate' 0.5 turns per week,
and you'll soon be overwinding the clock.
So.
A modest proposal.
The winding key should, in fact, be a miniature torque-wrench. In
this way, you'd be able to tell when the mainspring was wound
sufficiently to keep the clock running for 7 days, but not
overwound
to the point of over-driving the clock on the first day.
That's it, really.
You can stop reading now, because I am about to stop writing.
And don't talk to me about bloody fusées, that's all I can say.
Bloody fusees
http://webofstories.com/play/10679 [mouseposture, Jul 09 2010]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
|
1) I'm almost sure I owned a watch, once, with a clutch on
the stem. However, it was only to protect against damage
from overwinding, not to improve accuracy. |
|
|
2) Have you seen the George Daniels interviews on Web of
Stories? <link> |
|
|
Mouse - thank you so much for the link!!! I had not seen it,
and I am absolutely enchanted having watched two
"episodes". |
|
|
If I could live my life over again, I think I'd be happy to come
back as a watchmaker. Mechanical watches are so irrelevant
that it becomes possible to devote one's life to them. |
|
|
"And I decided one day that I would pluck up enough courage to take the spring out of the barrel of the gramophone motor so that I could examine it more closely. And I don't know why I thought I could examine it more closely, I suspect it was just traces of destructive interference that all boys have you see, I just wanted to find out what was in it. And I got this spring out and it was enormous and it was about six feet long and two inches wide" |
|
|
He got it back in - talk about a tiger by the tail. He'd make a great halfbaker. |
|
|
He was also lucky not to lose a finger. Just last week I
stupidly forgot to let down a mainspring before working on a
movement. The result was, in effect, a spring-driven circular
saw which ran for about one second, discharging all the
energy in the mainspring. Fortunately my finger was only
just touching the teeth of the mainspring wheel, so I just
got an eighth-inch groove taken out of me. Maybe that's why
I love watches more than clocks. |
|
| |